Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 813.235 (2026)

Attendance at victim impact treatment session as condition of diversion; exemptions; fee

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      813.235 Attendance at victim impact treatment session as condition of diversion; exemptions; fee. In a county that has a victim impact program a court may require as a condition of a driving while under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement that the defendant attend a victim impact treatment session. The court may not require a defendant to attend a victim impact treatment session if the defendant committed the current offense while riding a bicycle that is not an electric assisted bicycle. If the court requires attendance under this section, the court may require the defendant, as part of the diversion agreement, to pay a reasonable fee to the victim impact program to offset the cost of the defendant’s participation. The fee shall be established for each county by the victim impact panel coordinator and steering committee of that county and shall be not less than $5 or more than $50. [1987 c.830 §2; 1993 c.468 §2; 2023 c.498 §20]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2022 · leading case: State v. Colgrove, 521 P.3d 456 (Or. 2022).
State v. Colgrove, 521 P.3d 456 (Or. 2022). “” ORS 813.235. The diversion agreement “shall be for a period of one year after the date the court allows the petition.”
State v. Colgrove, 480 P.3d 1026 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “235 (a trial court “may” require as a condition of a DUII diversion agreement that the defen- dant attend a victim impact panel, if the county has a vic- tim impact program)—here, the trial court did in fact order defendant to attend a victim impact panel as a condition of her…”
State v. Zook, 476 P.3d 508 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). “240(3) ($150 fee for screening interview); ORS 813.200(4)(i) (agreement to pay court-appointed attorney fees in petition for diversion agree- ment); ORS 813.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.