Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 814.020 (2026)

Failure to obey traffic control device; penalty

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      814.020 Failure to obey traffic control device; penalty. (1) A pedestrian commits the offense of pedestrian failure to obey traffic control devices if the pedestrian does any of the following:

      (a) Fails to obey any traffic control device specifically applicable to the pedestrian.

      (b) Fails to obey any specific traffic control device described in ORS 814.010 in the manner required by that section.

      (2) A pedestrian is not subject to the requirements of this section if the pedestrian complies with directions of a police officer.

      (3) The offense described in this section, pedestrian failure to obey traffic control devices, is a Class D traffic violation. [1983 c.338 §552; 1995 c.383 §82]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2000–2015 · leading case: State v. Jimenez, 353 P.3d 1227 (Or. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Jimenez, 353 P.3d 1227 (Or. 2015). · cites it 4× “” 2 ORS 814.020 provides: “(1) A pedestrian commits the offense of pedestrian failure to obey traffic control devices if the pedestrian does any of the following: “(a) Fails to obey any traffic control device specifically applicable to the pedestrian.”
State v. Perez, 131 P.3d 168 (Or. 2006). “Defendant denied having any drugs or weapons and consented to a search.”
State v. Morfin-Estrada, 283 P.3d 378 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). “ORS 814.020(l)(b), (3). Galbreath pulled over and got out of his patrol car to talk to defendant and Delgado.”
State v. Tyler, 7 P.3d 624 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). “6 ORS 814.020 establishes the penalty for a failure to comply with the rules that ORS 814.”
State v. Jimenez, 326 P.3d 1222 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). “Around noon on January 24, 2011, Trooper Borchers of the Oregon State Police saw defendant walk across the street at a busy intersection in Portland (122nd Ave and Division) while the stop light there read “Don’t Walk” — a Class D violation under ORS 814.020(1) and (3). Borchers…”
State v. Jinenez (Or. 2015). · cites it 2× “” 2 ORS 814.020 provides: “(1) A pedestrian commits the offense of pedestrian failure to obey traffic control devices if the pedestrian does any of the following: “(a) Fails to obey any traffic control device specifically applicable to the pedestrian.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 814.020(1) — 4 cases
State v. Jimenez, 353 P.3d 1227 (Or. 2015). “” 2 ORS 814.020 provides: “(1) A pedestrian commits the offense of pedestrian failure to obey traffic control devices if the pedestrian does any of the following: “(a) Fails to obey any traffic control device specifically applicable to the pedestrian.”
State v. Perez, 131 P.3d 168 (Or. 2006). “Defendant denied having any drugs or weapons and consented to a search.”
State v. Jimenez, 326 P.3d 1222 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). “Around noon on January 24, 2011, Trooper Borchers of the Oregon State Police saw defendant walk across the street at a busy intersection in Portland (122nd Ave and Division) while the stop light there read “Don’t Walk” — a Class D violation under ORS 814.020(1) and (3). Borchers…”
State v. Jinenez (Or. 2015). “” 2 ORS 814.020 provides: “(1) A pedestrian commits the offense of pedestrian failure to obey traffic control devices if the pedestrian does any of the following: “(a) Fails to obey any traffic control device specifically applicable to the pedestrian.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 814.020(l)(b) — 1 case
State v. Morfin-Estrada, 283 P.3d 378 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). “ORS 814.020(l)(b), (3). Galbreath pulled over and got out of his patrol car to talk to defendant and Delgado.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.