Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 104 (2026)
Equitable remedies.
✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
PA-LEGpalegis.us
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 104. Equitable remedies.
Except to the extent otherwise provided in this title in cases where a statutory remedy is provided by this title, the court shall have the powers of a court of equity or chancery insofar as those powers relate to the supervision and control of corporations and other associations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1976–2024 · leading case: Baron v. Pritzker, 52 Pa. D. & C.4th 14 (2001).
Baron v. Pritzker, 52 Pa. D. & C.4th 14 (2001). “15 Pa.C.S. §104; 2 W. Edward Sell et al., Pennsylvania Business Corps.”
Toth, M. v. Toth, B., 324 A.3d 469 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024). “15 Pa.C.S. § 104;[12] Baron v. Pritzker, 52 Pa.”
Keranko v. Washington Youth Baseball, Inc., 584 A.2d 1082 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1990). “Alternatively, the Kerankos contend that they have standing under Section 104 of the Associations Code, 15 Pa.C.S. § 104. That Section states: Except to the extent otherwise provided in this title in cases where a statutory remedy is provided by this title, the court shall have…”
High River Ltd. P'ship v. Mylan Labs., Inc., 383 F. Supp. 2d 660 (M.D. Penn. 2005). “, 15 Pa. Cons.Stat. §§ 104, 1793. Moreover, it does not appear that High River has suffered any cognizable damages from the enactment of the bylaws.”
Kelso Woods Ass'n v. Swanson, 692 A.2d 1132 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1997). “As for the merits of the new assessments, which the trial court did not address beyond summarily concluding that they were “inequitable,” Mr.”
In re Butler Cnty. Mem'l Hosp., 368 A.2d 849 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1976). “The appellants argue that the proceeding in the Orphans ’ Court Division was ‘ ‘ equitable in nature, ’ ’ and that 15 Pa. C.S. §104 is an Act of Assembly subsequent to the AOJA which vests jurisdiction in this Court as *565 contemplated by Section 202(4) of the ACJA.”
Driver Opportunity Partners I, Lp v. Adams (W.D. Pa. 2023). “15 Pa. C.S. §§ 104, 1793. Relevant to this case, “Tt]he BCL allows corporations to enforce advance notice provisions only if they are ‘fair and reasonable’ in light of corporate needs.”
Anchel v. Shea, 44 Pa. D. & C.4th 144 (1999). “15 Pa.C.S. §104 and 15 Pa.C.S. §1793. BACKGROUND These findings and conclusions are preliminary in nature, are based upon the record before the court, and are mainly limited to the facts necessary for the determination of the present injunctive requests.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.