Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1576 (2026)

Failure to comply with notice to demand payment, etc.

✓ current as of May 2026

Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 1576. Failure to comply with notice to demand payment, etc.

(a) Effect of failure of shareholder to act.--A shareholder who fails to timely demand payment, or fails (in the case of certificated shares) to timely deposit certificates, as required by a notice pursuant to section 1575 (relating to notice to demand payment) shall not have any right under this subchapter to receive payment of the fair value of his shares.

(b) Restriction on uncertificated shares.--If the shares are not represented by certificates, the business corporation may restrict their transfer from the time of receipt of demand for payment until effectuation of the proposed corporate action or the release of restrictions under the terms of section 1577(a) (relating to failure to effectuate corporate action).

(c) Rights retained by shareholder.--The dissenter shall retain all other rights of a shareholder until those rights are modified by effectuation of the proposed corporate action.

(Dec. 19, 1990, P.L.834, No.198, eff. imd.)

1990 Amendment. Act 198 amended subsec. (a).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Colorcon, Inc. v. United States, 110 Fed. Cl. 650 (Fed. Cl. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Colorcon, Inc. v. United States, 110 Fed. Cl. 650 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “” 15 Pa.C.S. § 1576(c). B. Factual Background 8 1.”

— 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1576(c) — 1 case

Colorcon, Inc. v. United States, 110 Fed. Cl. 650 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “” 15 Pa.C.S. § 1576(c). B. Factual Background 8 1.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.