PART VIII
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
Chapter
87. General Provisions
89. Commencement of Proceedings
91. Detainers and Extradition
93. Trial
95. Post-trial Matters
97. Sentencing
98. County Intermediate Punishment
99. Other Criminal Provisions
Enactment. Part VIII was added July 9, 1976, P.L.586, No.142, effective 60 days from the date
of final enactment of the act of April 28, 1978, P.L.202, No.53.
CHAPTER 87
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subchapter
A. In General
B. Availability of Otherwise Confidential Information
Enactment. Chapter 87 was added July 9, 1976, P.L.586, No.142, effective 60 days from the date
of final enactment of the act of April 28, 1978, P.L.202, No.53.
SUBCHAPTER A
IN GENERAL
Sec.
8701. Interpreters for the deaf (Deleted by amendment).
8702. Impaneling jury from another county.
8703. Arraignment.
Subchapter Heading. The heading of Subchapter A was added October 5, 1980, P.L.693, No.142, effective
in 60 days.
§ 8701. Interpreters for the deaf (Deleted by amendment).
2006 Amendment. Section 8701 was deleted by amendment Nov. 29, 2006, P.L.1538, No.172, effective in
60 days.
Notes of Decisions
Commonwealth v. Wallace (1994)
pasuperct · cites it 7×
“The Commonwealth maintains that, because appellant admits to having some hearing and being able to read Kps, he does not meet the requirements for appointment of an interpreter under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8701. The Commonwealth argues further that appellant never made a request for an…”
Commonwealth v. Hull (1986)
pactcomplfayett · cites it 5×
“It is argued defendant’s initial statement to the police must be suppressed since he did not have the interpreter as required by 42 Pa.C.S. §8701. Therefore, he was not apprised of his Miranda warnings.”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 8701(a) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Hull (1986)
pactcomplfayett
“It is argued defendant’s initial statement to the police must be suppressed since he did not have the interpreter as required by 42 Pa.C.S. §8701. Therefore, he was not apprised of his Miranda warnings.”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 8701(b) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Wallace (1994)
pasuperct
“The Commonwealth maintains that, because appellant admits to having some hearing and being able to read Kps, he does not meet the requirements for appointment of an interpreter under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8701. The Commonwealth argues further that appellant never made a request for an…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 8701(d) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Hull (1986)
pactcomplfayett
“It is argued defendant’s initial statement to the police must be suppressed since he did not have the interpreter as required by 42 Pa.C.S. §8701. Therefore, he was not apprised of his Miranda warnings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.