Coverage note: this corpus holds the
consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check
palegis.us.
§ 3306. Civil actions.
The following shall apply:
(1) Notwithstanding any provision of 42 Pa.C.S. Ch. 85 Subch. C (relating to actions against
local parties), any person who is aggrieved by the enactment or enforcement of a local
ordinance that violates the MPC, this chapter or Chapter 32 (relating to development)
may bring an action in Commonwealth Court to invalidate the ordinance or enjoin its
enforcement.
(2) An aggrieved person may proceed under this section without first obtaining review
of the ordinance by the commission.
(3) In an action relating to the enactment or enforcement of a local ordinance, a determination
of the commission made under section 3305(b) (relating to commission) shall become
part of the record before the court.
Cross References. Section 3306 is referred to in section 3307 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Seitel Data, Ltd. v. Center Township (2014)
pacommwct · cites it 2×
“3 In all three petitions, Seitel asserts that this Court has original jurisdiction over the matters pursuant to section 3306(1) of Act 13, 58 Pa.C.S. § 3306(1). 4 The municipali *855 ties have filed preliminary objections, which contend, as a predominate issue, that this Court…”
Robinson Township v. Commonwealth (2014)
pacommwct · cites it 2×
“Likewise, 58 Pa.C.S. § 3306 provides that any person aggrieved “by the enactment or enforcement of a local ordinance that violates the MPC, this chapter or Chapter 32 (relating to development)” may bring an action in this Court “to invalidate the ordinance or enjoin its…”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3306(1) — 1 case
Seitel Data, Ltd. v. Center Township (2014)
pacommwct
“3 In all three petitions, Seitel asserts that this Court has original jurisdiction over the matters pursuant to section 3306(1) of Act 13, 58 Pa.C.S. § 3306(1). 4 The municipali *855 ties have filed preliminary objections, which contend, as a predominate issue, that this Court…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.