Pa. Cons. Stat. » 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. (VEHICLES) / Chapter 13
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1374 (2026)

  Suspension or revocation of vehicle business registration plates.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 1374.  Suspension or revocation of vehicle business registration plates.

(a)  Suspension or revocation after opportunity for hearing.--The department may impose a monetary penalty for certain violations and offenses as prescribed by regulation or this section or suspend or revoke registration plates for dealers, manufacturers or members of the "Miscellaneous Motor Vehicle Business" class after providing an opportunity for a hearing in any of the following cases when the department finds upon sufficient evidence that:

(1)  Except as provided in subsection (g)(1) the registrant is no longer entitled to licensing as a dealer or manufacturer or to registration in the "Miscellaneous Motor Vehicle Business" class.

(2)  The registrant has made or permitted to be made any unlawful use of the vehicle or registration plate or plates or registration card or permitted the use by a person not entitled thereto.

(3)  The registrant has knowingly made a false statement or knowingly concealed a material fact or otherwise committed a fraud in any application.

(4)  The registrant has failed to give notice of transfer of ownership or of the destruction or junking of any vehicle when and as required by this title.

(5)  The registrant has failed to deliver to a transferee lawfully entitled thereto or to the department, when and as required by this title, a properly assigned certificate of title.

(6)  The registrant has repeatedly violated any of the provisions of this title.

(7)  Any fee payable to the Commonwealth in connection with the operation of the business of the registrant has not been paid.

(b)  Mitigating events.--The opportunity for a hearing as authorized by subsection (a) shall include the consideration of relevant mitigating events as prescribed by regulation for violations and offenses of subsection (a)(2), (5) and (7).

(c)  Written warning for first offense.--If the registrant violates subsection (a)(2), (5) or (7) as a first offense, the department shall sanction the registrant with a written warning without providing the opportunity for a hearing.

(d)  Schedule of sanctions.--The department shall impose the following sanctions for violations:

(1)  If the department finds that the registrant has violated subsection (a)(5) or (7) as a second offense, the registrant may be sanctioned with a monetary penalty of not less than $50 and not more than $100 per violation.

(2)  If the department finds that the registrant has violated subsection (a)(5) or (7) as a third offense, the registrant may be sanctioned with a monetary penalty of not less than $100 and not more than $200 per violation.

(2.1)  If the department finds that the registrant has violated subsection (a)(5) as a fourth or subsequent offense, the department may suspend for not less than three months or revoke the registration plates and cards of the registrant.

(3)  A monetary penalty imposed for a violation of subsection (a)(5) shall be in addition to the requirement that the registrant deliver a properly assigned certificate of title. Unless extended by the department, if the registrant fails to pay the monetary penalty or to deliver the certificate of title within 45 days after notice was sent by the department, except as otherwise provided by section 1377 (relating to judicial review), the department shall suspend the registrant's registration plates until the monetary penalty has been paid and the title delivered.

(4)  A monetary penalty imposed for a violation of subsection (a)(7) shall be in addition to payment of the original amount due for taxes and fees and any other penalty provided by law for submission of an uncollectible or dishonored check. Unless extended by the department, if the registrant fails to pay the monetary penalty, the original amount due or any other penalty within 45 days after notice was sent by the department, except as otherwise provided by section 1377, the department shall suspend the registrant's registration plates until all fees, taxes and penalties have been paid.

(5)  A violation of subsection (a)(2) or (5) shall remain on the registrant's record for a period of 18 months from the date that the violation was sanctioned by the department. If the registrant does not commit another violation of subsection (a)(2) or (5) within that 18-month period, the department shall rescind from the registrant's record the prior sanction that was imposed. After rescission of the prior sanction, if the registrant thereafter commits a subsequent violation of subsection (a)(2) or (5), that violation shall be considered the same degree of offense as was previously imposed, unless more than three years have elapsed since the last date that the registrant was sanctioned for a violation of subsection (a)(2) or (5), in which case said subsequent violation shall be deemed a first offense.

(6)  If the department has previously given notice of, and considered at a departmental hearing, violations of subsection (a)(5), no sanction shall be imposed for an alleged violation of subsection (a)(5) which was not included within said notice if said violation occurred prior to the date of the notice, the department's records reflected that the violation existed and the violation could have been included in the notice as an additional subject of the departmental hearing.

(7)  If a registrant is sanctioned pursuant to subsection (c) or paragraph (1) or (2) or the corresponding provisions of departmental regulations, 67 Pa. Code Ch. 53 (relating to manufacturers, dealers and miscellaneous motor vehicle businesses registration plates), and the department also sanctions the registrant for corresponding violations as an issuing agent pursuant to departmental regulations, 67 Pa. Code Ch. 43 (relating to temporary registration cards and plates), the department shall only impose the sanction prescribed by this section or the corresponding section of 67 Pa. Code Ch. 53. Notwithstanding, the department shall note the offense pertaining to the registrant and the offense pertaining to the issuing agent upon each record, and the department shall consider each record when calculating second, third or subsequent offenses by the registrant and the issuing agent.

(e)  Hearing.--Until regulations are prescribed by the department as authorized by subsection (b), the hearing shall include the consideration of relevant mitigating events for a violation of subsection (a)(2), (5) or (7).

(f)  Interim regulations.--Until such regulations are prescribed by the department as authorized by subsections (a) and (b), the applicable departmental regulations as currently promulgated shall remain in full force and effect, except as specifically superseded by the provisions of subsections (c), (d) and (e).

(g)  Suspension without hearing.--The department may suspend or revoke registration plates for dealers, manufacturers or members of the "Miscellaneous Motor Vehicle Business" class without providing the opportunity for a hearing in any of the following cases:

(1)  The registrant's license as a dealer or manufacturer has been suspended or revoked by the State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers and Salespersons or the board has determined that the registrant is not entitled to such a license.

(2)  If the Pennsylvania State Police shall certify that the dealer, manufacturer or member of the "Miscellaneous Motor Vehicle Business" class is no longer in business.

(h)  Recommended action by State licensing board.--The department may also audit and investigate dealers and manufacturers registered by the State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers and Salespersons to determine whether any dealer or manufacturer has violated any provision of this title pertaining to dealers or manufacturers or any regulation promulgated by the department. The department may recommend that the State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers and Salespersons suspend the license of any dealer or manufacturer which it finds has committed a violation and the board shall take prompt action on any such recommendations under the act of December 22, 1983 (P.L.306, No.84), known as the Board of Vehicles Act.

(July 10, 1990, P.L.356, No.83, eff. 30 days; June 28, 1993, P.L.137, No.33, eff. 60 days; July 11, 1996, P.L.660, No.115, eff. 60 days; Dec. 21, 1998, P.L.1126, No.151, eff. 60 days)

 

1998 Amendment.  Act 151 amended subsecs. (d)(5) and (e).

1996 Amendment.  Act 115 amended subsec. (d).

Cross References.  Section 1374 is referred to in section 1376 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1986–2015 · leading case: Saia's Used Cars v. Commonwealth, 596 A.2d 1212 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Saia's Used Cars v. Commonwealth, 596 A.2d 1212 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991). · cites it 7× “Saia contends that because both 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a) and 67 Pa.Code § 58.”
Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 700 A.2d 922 (Pa. 1997). · cites it 13× “5 Pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5), Penn-DOT may impose a monetary penalty when it finds upon sufficient evidence that “the registrant has failed to deliver to a transferee lawfully entitled thereto or to [PennDOT], when and as required by this title, a properly assigned…”
Philadelphia Honda, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 666 A.2d 349 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). · cites it 6× “Initially, DOT argues that the trial court erred as a matter of law when it considered Philadelphia Honda’s percentage of untimely title submissions as a “relevant mitigating event” under 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374. Second, DOT asserts that the trial court erred as a matter of law when…”
Morabito's Auto Sales v. Com., Dept. of Transp., 715 A.2d 384 (Pa. 1998). “00, in total, for twenty-seven violations of 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5), which requires that properly assigned certificates of title be delivered in a timely fashion.”
Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp. v. Colonial Nissan, Inc., 691 A.2d 1005 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1997). · cites it 2× “Section 1374(a) of the Vehicle Code (Vehicle Code), 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374, provides in pertinent part: (a) Suspension or revocation after opportunity for hearing.”
Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Motor Vehs., 670 A.2d 1186 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). · cites it 4× “On May 13, 1994, DOT issued an order determining that Dealer had committed fifty-seven violations of failing to submit timely title applications to *1188 DOT in violation of Section 1374(a)(5) of the Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5). In that order, DOT imposed fifty-seven separate…”
Ridge AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 520 A.2d 515 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987). “4 Consequently, Ridge had been notified on February 13, 1985 that its dealers registration plates would be suspended for a period of one month pursuant to Section 1374(a)(5) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. §1374(a)(5), 5 and 67 Pa. Code §53.”
Benson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 602 A.2d 496 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1992). · cites it 2× “Violations of this section may lead to the suspension of registration plates for dealers pursuant to section 1374(a)(5) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5), which provides: (a) General rule.”
Commonwealth v. Ede Motor Co., 527 A.2d 632 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987). “2 The trial court also found that the penalty provisions of Section 1374(a)(5) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. §1374(a)(5), were discretionary, rather than mandatory because of that sections use of the word “may.”
Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Motor Vehs. v. Kosak, 639 A.2d 1252 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994). “The Vehicle Code provided statutory authority for such suspensions at 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374, authorizing them when “[a]ny fee payable to the Commonwealth in connection with the operation of the business of the registrant has not been paid.”
Off. of the Constable v. Dep't of Transp., 112 A.3d 678 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). “75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5) (allowing sanctions if registered dealer fails to timely deliver certificate of title to transferee lawfully entitled thereto or to DOT); see Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc.”
Ernest Sunday Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 558 A.2d 921 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1989). “75 Pa. C.S. § 1374(a)(5). Further, Section 1103(d) of the Code provides: (d) Vehicles purchased from dealers.”
Show all 17 citing cases →
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1374(a) — 2 cases
Saia's Used Cars v. Commonwealth, 596 A.2d 1212 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991). “Saia contends that because both 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a) and 67 Pa.Code § 58.”
Commonwealth v. Foxwood R.V. Ctr. & Campground, 547 A.2d 504 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988).
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1374(a)(2) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Grutza, 567 A.2d 784 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1989).
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1374(a)(5) — 11 cases
Morabito's Auto Sales v. Com., Dept. of Transp., 715 A.2d 384 (Pa. 1998). “00, in total, for twenty-seven violations of 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5), which requires that properly assigned certificates of title be delivered in a timely fashion.”
Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 700 A.2d 922 (Pa. 1997). “5 Pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5), Penn-DOT may impose a monetary penalty when it finds upon sufficient evidence that “the registrant has failed to deliver to a transferee lawfully entitled thereto or to [PennDOT], when and as required by this title, a properly assigned…”
Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Motor Vehs., 670 A.2d 1186 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “On May 13, 1994, DOT issued an order determining that Dealer had committed fifty-seven violations of failing to submit timely title applications to *1188 DOT in violation of Section 1374(a)(5) of the Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5). In that order, DOT imposed fifty-seven separate…”
Ridge AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 520 A.2d 515 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987). “4 Consequently, Ridge had been notified on February 13, 1985 that its dealers registration plates would be suspended for a period of one month pursuant to Section 1374(a)(5) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. §1374(a)(5), 5 and 67 Pa. Code §53.”
Benson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 602 A.2d 496 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1992). “Violations of this section may lead to the suspension of registration plates for dealers pursuant to section 1374(a)(5) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5), which provides: (a) General rule.”
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1374(a)(5)(1995) — 1 case
Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 700 A.2d 922 (Pa. 1997). “5 Pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5), Penn-DOT may impose a monetary penalty when it finds upon sufficient evidence that “the registrant has failed to deliver to a transferee lawfully entitled thereto or to [PennDOT], when and as required by this title, a properly assigned…”
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1374(a)(7) — 1 case
Saia's Used Cars v. Commonwealth, 596 A.2d 1212 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991). “Saia contends that because both 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a) and 67 Pa.Code § 58.”
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1374(b) — 1 case
Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 700 A.2d 922 (Pa. 1997). “5 Pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5), Penn-DOT may impose a monetary penalty when it finds upon sufficient evidence that “the registrant has failed to deliver to a transferee lawfully entitled thereto or to [PennDOT], when and as required by this title, a properly assigned…”
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1374(b)(1995) — 1 case
Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 700 A.2d 922 (Pa. 1997). “5 Pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5), Penn-DOT may impose a monetary penalty when it finds upon sufficient evidence that “the registrant has failed to deliver to a transferee lawfully entitled thereto or to [PennDOT], when and as required by this title, a properly assigned…”
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1374(d)(1) — 1 case
Philadelphia Honda, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 666 A.2d 349 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “Initially, DOT argues that the trial court erred as a matter of law when it considered Philadelphia Honda’s percentage of untimely title submissions as a “relevant mitigating event” under 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374. Second, DOT asserts that the trial court erred as a matter of law when…”
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1374(d)(2) — 1 case
Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Motor Vehs., 670 A.2d 1186 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “On May 13, 1994, DOT issued an order determining that Dealer had committed fifty-seven violations of failing to submit timely title applications to *1188 DOT in violation of Section 1374(a)(5) of the Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5). In that order, DOT imposed fifty-seven separate…”
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1374(d)(2)(l995) — 1 case
Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 700 A.2d 922 (Pa. 1997). “5 Pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 1374(a)(5), Penn-DOT may impose a monetary penalty when it finds upon sufficient evidence that “the registrant has failed to deliver to a transferee lawfully entitled thereto or to [PennDOT], when and as required by this title, a properly assigned…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.