Pa. Cons. Stat. » 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. (VEHICLES) / Chapter 15
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1584 (2026)

 Furnishing of information to other states.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 1584.  Furnishing of information to other states.

The Department of Transportation of the Commonwealth shall furnish to the appropriate authorities of any other party state any information or documents reasonably necessary to facilitate the administration of Articles III, IV and V of the compact. The omission from any report received by the department from a party state of any information required by Article III of the compact shall not excuse or prevent the department from complying with its duties under Articles IV and V of the compact.

(Dec. 21, 1998, P.L.1126, No.151, eff. imd.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCafferty, 758 A.2d 1155 (Pa. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCafferty, 758 A.2d 1155 (Pa. 2000). · cites it 4× “I also disagree with the majority's intimation that the legislative attempt to amend the requirements of Article III by amending 75 Pa.C.S. § 1584 supports its conclusion, since it is unclear whether this amendment can overrule the mandatory requirements of Article III.”
Crooks v. Com., Dept. of Transp., 768 A.2d 1106 (Pa. 2001). · cites it 6× “Finally, the court held that the 1998 amendment to the Driver's License Compact, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1584, was unconstitutional as violative of due process.”
Gallant v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 805 A.2d 1 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002). · cites it 6× “On December 21, 1998 the Legislature amended 75 Pa.C.S. § 1584 of the Compact, adding the following sentence: The omission from any report received by the department from a party state of any information required by Article III *12 of the compact shall not excuse or prevent the…”
Sweet v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 724 A.2d 1004 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1999). · cites it 7× “) However, the Department then counte-rargues that the General Assembly, on December 21, 1998, amended 75 Pa.C.S. § 1584 to provide that “[t]he omission from any report received by the department from a party state of any information required by Article III of the compact shall…”
Siekierda v. Com., Dept. of Transp., 860 A.2d 76 (Pa. 2004). · cites it 2× “75 Pa.C.S. § 1584. Although the McCafferty Court recognized that this amendment was enacted after the appellee's conviction, we noted its tangential significance in that it "explicitly recognizes what is implicit in the structure of the Compact: states play different roles…”
PennDOT v. Harrington, 42 Pa. D. & C.4th 153 (1999). · cites it 8× “§1581, article III of the Driver’s License Compact and 75 Pa.C.S. § 1584 was unduly restrictive, was in violation of the mandates under the Driver’s License Compact, and beyond the limited scope of review of a bureau conviction-based suspension.”
Harrington v. Commonwealth, 763 A.2d 386 (Pa. 2000). · cites it 2× “75 Pa.C.S. § 1584 (emphasis added). [5] The Bureau further argued that not only were the documents sufficient pursuant to the amendment, but also, Harrington's own testimony cured any discrepancy.”
Probst v. Com., Dept. of Transp., 849 A.2d 1135 (Pa. 2004). “§ 722(7), in which we considered a common pleas court’s declaration that an amendment to Section 1584 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1584, was unconstitutional. Observing that the parties in a number of direct appeals in other related cases had raised issues that were not…”
Horvath v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 773 A.2d 199 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001). · cites it 3× “Horvath contends: (1) that his New York conviction for driving while ability impaired (DWAI) is not substantially similar to the conduct described in Article IV(a)(2) of the Compact; (2) that the 1998 legislative enactments embodied in Sections 1584 and 1586 of the Vehicle Code,…”
Renna v. Com., Dept. of Transp., 762 A.2d 785 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000). · cites it 2× “See 75 Pa.C.S. § 1584. 6 . 75 Pa.C.S. § 1584.”
Squire v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 769 A.2d 1224 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001). · cites it 2× “" 75 Pa.C.S. § 1584. Since McCafferty was decided under pre-amendment law, we need not address the applicability of the more liberal standard to the present case.”
Folsom v. Com., Dept. of Trans., 771 A.2d 118 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001). · cites it 4× “s that the licensing authority of the convicting state shall provide a report of conviction, which clearly identifies the person convicted, describes the violation, "specifying the section of the statute, code or ordinance violated," identifies the court in which action was…”
Show all 38 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.