green
Positive treatment
13.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1942 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1942
1984
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
PNC Bank v. Lehr, A.
(3×)
Their liability is strictissimi juris.2 Barratt v. Greenfield, 137 Pa.Super. 310 , 9 A.2d 188, 189 (1939). 2“TT]o be interpreted in the strictest manner.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1435 (7th ed.1999).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
J.F. Walker Co. v. Excalibur Oil Group, Inc.
Their liability is strictissimi juris. 2 Barratt v. Greenfield, 137 Pa.Super. 310 , 9 A.2d 188, 189 (1939).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eastern Steel Const. v. International Fidelity
See Barratt v. Greenfield, 9 A.2d 188, 189 (Pa. 1939) (noting that “in cases of corporate sureties the bond is to be strictly construed in favor of the oblige[e.]”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eastern Steel Const. v. International Fidelity
See Barratt v. Greenfield, 9 A.2d 188, 189 (Pa. 1939) (noting that “in cases of corporate sureties the bond is to be strictly construed in favor of the oblige[e.]”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Voest-Alpine Trading Usa Corporation v. Vantage Steel Corporation
(2×)
See Barratt v. Greenfield, 9 A.2d 188, 190-91 , 137 Pa.Super. 310 (1930). 99 Thus, VATCO here, where there was no proof that the Stablers' guarantee was intended for VATCO's benefit, is in no different position than was the Ferguson Carpet Company: both were strangers to the respective guarantees--in the one case, the guarantee from Schottenfeld to Allenson and in the present case, the guarantee from the Stablers to NJNB.
discussed
Cited "see"
Voest-Alpine Trading USA Corp. v. Vantage Steel Corp.
(2×)
See Barratt v. Greenfield, 9 A.2d 188, 190-91 , 137 Pa.Super. 310 (1930).
Barratt
v.
Greenfield.
v.
Greenfield.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 3, 1939.
Henry B. Coxe, Jr., of Barratt Coxe, for appellant.
William A Schnader, with him Jerome L. Markovitz and Gilbert J. Kraus, of Kraus Weyl, for appellee.
PER CURIAM, November 15, 1939:.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
Argued October 3, 1939. The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge OLIVER.