Stephens v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 186 A.3d 397 (Pa. 2018). · Go Syfert
Search
Stephens v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 186 A.3d 397 (Pa. 2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“we do not read words in isolation, but with reference to the context in which they appear”
32 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: MERSCORP v. Delaware Co., Aplts. (pa, 2019-04-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2018 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2018 2022 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) MERSCORP v. Delaware Co., Aplts.
Pa. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
we do not read words in isolation, but with reference to the context in which they appear
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Merscorp, Inc. v. Del. Cnty.
Pa. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
we do not read words in isolation, but with reference to the context in which they appear
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Com. v. Swift, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
sentencing court always retains discretion to sentence outside the guideline range
cited Cited as authority (rule) BRUNO v. ROUNDHOUSE CYCLES, INC.
W.D. Pa. · 2024 · confidence medium
Smith, 186 A.3d 397, 403 (Pa. 2018).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Com. v. Waiters, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2022 · confidence medium
Commonwealth v. Smith, 186 A.3d 397, 400 (Pa. 2018) (citing Walls, 926 A.2d at 962 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re: Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline L.P. ~ Appeal of: E.S. Gerhart
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 2019 · confidence medium
In McMullen, the Supreme Court held that the courts “have the authority to punish individuals in violation of their orders” and “the legislature cannot create a form of indirect criminal contempt and restrict a court’s ability to 3 See In re Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline (Pa. Cmwlth., No. 220 C.D. 2016, filed May 15, 2017), where this Court held that it did not have the authority to second guess the PUC’s award of a certificate of public convenience to Sunoco. 4 The Sentencing Guidelines “are promulgated by the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing … a legislative agency create…
examined Cited "see" Hudson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole (16×)
Pa. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at ----, 186 A.3d at 402 -03 .
Jeffrey STEPHENS
v.
The PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, and State Correctional Institution at Dallas
No. 68 MAP 2017.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jun 1, 2018.
186 A.3d 397
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (1) · Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)
PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2018, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.