In re Flowers, 697 A.2d 289 (Pa. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Flowers, 697 A.2d 289 (Pa. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Schenck v. TOWNSHIP OF CENTER (pa, 2009-07-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see" Schenck v. TOWNSHIP OF CENTER (2×)
Pa. · 2009 · signal: accord · confidence high
Prior to 2003, the Right to Know Act expressly centered the judicial review upon whether an agency’s denial of a request for information was for “just and proper cause.” 7 65 P.S. § 66.4 (superseded); accord Dynamic Student Servs. v. State Sys. of Higher Educ., 548 Pa. 347, 352 , 697 A.2d 239, 242 (1997).
In the Matter of Christine M. FLOWERS
No. 24 DB 97.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jun 13, 1997.
697 A.2d 289
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 1997, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 15, 1997, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that CHRISTINE M. FLOWERS, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.