Brown v. Candelora, 725 A.2d 176 (Pa. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Brown v. Candelora, 725 A.2d 176 (Pa. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sevast v. Kakouras (pasuperct, 2003-12-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see" Sevast v. Kakouras
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. Candelora, 708 A.2d 104 (Pa.Super.1998), appeal granted, 555 Pa. 478 , 725 A.2d 176 (1999) (conditional, unliquidated claim for breach of contract is not subject to attachment).
Robert BROWN and Joann Brown, His Wife
v.
Pauline CANDELORA, of The Estate of Nicholad Yiambilis, a/k/a Nicholas Yiambilis, Nationwide Insurance Company
Petition No. 101 E.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1998.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 16, 1999.
725 A.2d 176
Laura A. Feldman, Philadelphia, for petitioner.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issue of whether the Superior Court erred by affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas granting Respondent Nation[*479] wide’s petition to set aside Petitioners’ garnishment proceeding based on claims of bad faith even though those claims had not been expressly assigned to Petitioners by the insured and even though Nationwide had already paid the full limits of the insured’s policy.[1]

1

We note that the grant of allocatur in the instant case is strictly limited to the issue presented in this Order, and that the parties are not to brief or present argument concerning Petitioner’s allegation that the lower courts should have permitted its garnishment action against Respondent Nationwide to proceed based on Nationwide's obligation to pay delay damages and/or judgment interest.