discussed Cited "see" Kapcsos, A. v. Benshoff, M. (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g." “The scope of review of a final [order] in equity is limited and will not be disturbed unless it is unsupported by the evidence or demonstrably capricious.” Sack v. Feinman, 413 A.2d 1059, 1066 (Pa. 1980); accord Nicholson v. Johnston, 855 A.2d 97, 100 (Pa. Super. 2004), appeal denied, 868 A.2d 453 (Pa. 2005).

discussed Cited "see" HUTCHISON EX. REL. HUTCHISON v. Luddy (2×) See Berger v. Sehetman, 883 A.2d 631, 640 (Pa.Super.2005) (observing that “ ‘[t]he fact finder is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence and the Superior Court will not disturb the credibility determinations of the court below' ”), quoting Nicholson v. Johnston, 855 A.2d 97, 102 (Pa.Super.2004), appeal denied, 582 Pa. 665 , 868 A.2d 453 (2005). ¶ 41 Turning next to Father Luddy, the Hutchison III panel has amply set forth evidence of Father Luddy’s behavior with Michael, his brother Mark, and other boys, as well as Bishop Hogan’s and the other Diocesan parties’ acts or…