green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
15.9 score
“a true weight of the evidence challenge concedes that sufficient evidence exists to sustain the verdict but questions which evidence is to be believed.”
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Com. v. Watts, D.
a true weight of the evidence challenge concedes that sufficient evidence exists to sustain the verdict but questions which evidence is to believed.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Com. v. Banks, J.
a true weight of the evidence challenge concedes that sufficient evidence exists to sustain the verdict but questions which evidence is to be believed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Acres, B.
See Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 510 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 880 A.2d 1237 (Pa. 2005). “[A]n abuse of discretion is not merely an error of judgment, but is rather the overriding or misapplication of the law, or the exercise of judgment that is manifestly unreasonable, or the result of bias, prejudice, ill-will[,] or partiality, as shown by the evidence or the record.” Commonwealth v. Bullock, 170 A.3d 1109, 1117 (Pa. Super. 2017), appeal denied, 184 A.3d 944 (Pa. 2018) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Lockhart, E.
See Commonwealth v. Lockhart, 839 A.2d 1157 (Pa. Super. 2003) (unpublished memorandum), appeal denied, 880 A.2d 1237 (Pa. 2005).1 ____________________________________________ 1 After Lockhart filed his first pro se PCRA Petition, the PCRA court subsequently granted Lockhart leave to file a petition for allowance of appeal nunc pro tunc, from this Court’s October 7, 2003 Order.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Kitchen, T.
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 506-507 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 584 Pa. 673 , 880 A.2d 1237 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Nelson, K.
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 506-507 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 584 Pa. 673 , 880 A.2d 1237 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Smalls, S.
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 506-507 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 584 Pa. 673 , 880 A.2d 1237 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Oakes, J.
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 506-507 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 584 Pa. 673 , 880 A.2d 1237 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Tielsch
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 505 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 584 Pa. 673 , 880 A.2d 1237 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Castelhun
See also, Commonwealth v. L.N., 787 A.2d 1064 (Pa.Super.2001), appeal denied, 569 Pa. 680 , 800 A.2d 931 (2002). ¶ 16 Likewise, a person will be found guilty of aggravated indecent assault if they engage “in penetration, however slight, of the genitals or anus of a complainant with a part of the person’s body for any purpose other than good faith medical, hygienic or law enforcement procedures.” 18 Pa.Cons.Stat.AnN.§ 3125(a); see also Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 505 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, - Pa. -, 880 A.2d 1237 (2005). 7 In Commonwealth v. Kelley, 569 Pa. 179 , 801 A…
COM.
v.
HONESTY.
v.
HONESTY.
1105 MAL (2004).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 16, 2005.
Cited by 34 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (2)
Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.