green
Positive treatment
Trending · 114 recent citers
10.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Commonwealth v. Carlos Colina
Furthermore, "there is nothing in the jurisprudence of . . . the Fourth Amendment that permits a [judge] to invalidate a warrant supported by probable cause based on the [judge's] belief that the police simply do not need to seek further evidence of a crime." Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188, 193, 202 , cert. denied, 562 U.S. 832 (2010) (judge erred in concluding it was unnecessary for police to obtain further information concerning identity of victim).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Young, M.
Id. (citing Commonwealth v. McCree, 592 Pa. 238 , 924 A.2d 621, 627 (2007)); see Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188 , 988 A.2d 649, 656 (2010).").
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Hopkins, L., Jr.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188, 199 , 988 A.2d 649, 655 (2010) (“Probable cause exists where the facts and circumstances within the affiant’s knowledge and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that a search should be conducted.” (quoting Commonwealth v. Thomas, 448 Pa. 42, 52 , 292 A.2d 352, 357 (1972))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Hopkins, L., Jr.
See Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188, 199 , 988 A.2d 649, 655 (2010) (“Probable cause exists where the facts and circumstances within the affiant’s knowledge and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that a search should be conducted.” (quoting Commonwealth v. Thomas, 448 Pa. 42, 52 , 292 A.2d 352, 357 (1972))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Rapak
See Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188 , 988 A.2d 649 (2010) (indicating a reviewing court must determine whether the issuing magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding probable cause existed and is not to conduct a de novo review of the issuing authority's probable cause determination).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Smith, D.
See Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188 , 988 A.2d 649, 654 (2010) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Wiggins, O.
Id. (citing Commonwealth v. McCree, 592 Pa. 238 , 924 A.2d 621, 627 (Pa.2007)); see Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188 , 988 A.2d 649, 656 (Pa.2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Lyles
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188 , 988 A.2d 649, 654 (2010) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Williams
Id. (citing Commonwealth v. McCree, 592 Pa. 238 , 924 A.2d 621, 627 (Pa.2007)); see Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188 , 988 A.2d 649, 656 (Pa.2010).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Whitlock
Id. (citing Commonwealth v. McCree, 592 Pa. 238 , 924 A.2d 621, 627 (2007)); see Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188 , 988 A.2d 649, 656 (2010).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Au
See Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188, 197-98 , 988 A.2d 649, 654 (2010) (discussing the standard of review pertaining to suppression rulings).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Janda
See Jones, 605 Pa. 188 , 988 A.2d at 659-68 (Castille, C.J., and Todd, J. concurring). 7 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth, Aplt v. Gross, E.
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188 , 988 A.2d 649, 654 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Brown
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Jones, 605 Pa. 188, 201 , 988 A.2d 649, 656 (2010) ("This doctrine permits a valid warrantless seizure of an item where: (1) the police have not violated the Fourth Amendment in arriving at the location from which the item could be viewed; (2) the item is in plain view; (3) the incriminating character of the item is immediately apparent; and (4) the police have a lawful right of access to the item itself.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 110 , 178 L.Ed.2d 32 (2010). .
COM. Ex Rel. Ricky TEJADA, Appellant
v.
Jeffery A. BEARD, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Et Al., Appellee
v.
Jeffery A. BEARD, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Et Al., Appellee
62 MAP 2009.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Feb 16, 2010.
Per Curiam.
Published
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of February, 2010, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Jurisdiction relinquished.