Case details

Court: ca9
Docket #: 13-56028
Case Name: Ingenuity13 LLC v. John Doe
PACER case #: 13-56028
Date filed: 06/13/2013
Nature of Suit: 3820 Copyright

Documents

Date Filed Document # Attachment # Short Description Long Description Upload date SHA1 hash
06/13/2013 1 0 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. on 06/12/2013. Transcript ordered by 07/12/2013. Transcript due 10/10/2013. Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. opening brief due 11/19/2013. Appellees John Doe and Paul Duffy answering brief due 12/19/2013. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8666532] (BG)
1 1 Main Document 2013-06-13 20:27:26 7db5c3bc7482592e49d1380828fbbe101dee6b42
1 2 pro se appls
1 3 Docketing Letter
1 4 Informal Brief Notice
07/09/2013 3 0 Filed order (ALEX KOZINSKI, WILLIAM C. CANBY and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) Appellant Prenda Law, Inc.’s June 14, 2013 emergency “motion for order vacating or modifying the district court’s amended order denying in part and granting in part [] Paul Duffy’s motion for approval of bond []; staying nforcement of amended order,” filed in appeal no. 13-55881, is denied. See Azizian v. Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc., 499 F.3d 950, 955 (9th Cir. 2007) (court reviews objections to amount of bond on appeal for abuse of discretion). Appellant Prenda Law, Inc.’s June 14, 2013 request for consolidation, filed in appeal no. 13-55881, is granted. The court sua sponte consolidates the following appeals: 13-55859, 13- 55871, 13-55880, 13-55881, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, and 13-56028. The following briefing schedule shall govern these consolidated appeals: the consolidated opening brief(s) and excerpts of record are due November 19, 2013; the consolidated answering brief(s) is due December 19, 2013; and the consolidated optional reply brief(s) is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. All parties on a side are encouraged to join in a single brief to the greatest extent practicable. See 9th Cir. R. 28-4. To the extent that appellant Prenda Law, Inc.’s June 14, 2013 emergency motion, filed in appeal no. 13-55881, requests any other relief, such requests are denied. Judge Canby dissents as to the denial of a stay of the condition requiring a second bond in the amount of $135,933.66. Otherwise, Judge Canby concurs in this order. [8696617] [13-55859, 13-55871, 13-55880, 13-55881, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, 13-56028] (WL)
08/02/2013 4 0 Filed (ECF) Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. in 13-55881 corporate disclosure statement. Date of service: 08/02/2013. [8729170] [13-55881, 13-55859, 13-55871, 13-55880, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, 13-56028] (PWV)