Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-37.1-1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known and be cited as the “Sexual Offender Registration and Community Notification Act”.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2023 · leading case: United States v. Ditomasso, 552 F. Supp. 2d 233 (D.R.I. 2008).
United States v. Ditomasso, 552 F. Supp. 2d 233 (D.R.I. 2008). · cites it 2× “See R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 11-37.1-1 to -20; Smith v.”
United States v. Kebodeaux, 133 S. Ct. 2496 (2013). “9 (2006); R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 11-37.1-1 to 11-37.1-12 (2002 and Supp.”
State v. Bryant, 614 S.E.2d 479 (N.C. 2005). “2004); R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-37.1-1 (Supp. 2004); S.”
Graves v. State, 772 A.2d 1225 (Md. 2001). “01-99 (Anderson 2000); R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 11-37.1-1 to .1-19 (1999); Tenn.”
Cain v. State, 872 A.2d 681 (Md. 2005). “6 (1998); R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 11-37.1-1 to 11-37.1-19 (1999); S.”
State v. Germane, 971 A.2d 555 (R.I. 2009). “The factors listed below should be con *587 sidered in conjunction with those facts that have already been articulated in RI General Laws § 11-37.1-1.” 43 This language clearly requires the board of review to consider each of the listed factors “in each risk level determination.”
State v. Burr, 598 N.W.2d 147 (N.D. 1999). “5; R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 11-37.1-1 to 11-37.1-19; S.”
United States v. Stevens, 598 F. Supp. 2d 133 (D. Me. 2009). · cites it 2× “The new law, the Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Act (SORCNA), R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-37.1-1 et seq., required that sex offenders register annually, but limited their registration obligation to ten years from the date of conviction: 11-37.”
Graves v. State, 754 A.2d 493 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2000). “6 (West 1998); R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 11-37.1-1 to .1-19 (Supp.”
Chapdelaine v. Neronha (D.R.I. 2023). · cites it 3× “See R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-37.1-1 et seg. Accordingly, even were the Attorney General able to articulate a standard that is not vague, it is unclear that his office would have the authority to do so.”
People v. Olivera, 184 Misc. 2d 327 (N.Y. City Crim. Ct. 2000). “…tit 57, §§ 581-589 (1999); Ore Rev Stat §§ 181.594-181.606 (1997); 42 Pa Cons Stat Annot §§ 9791-9799.6 (1999); RI Gen Laws §§ 11-37.1-1 — 11-37.1-19 (2000); SC Code Annot §§ 23-3-400— 23-3-520 (1998); SD Codified Laws §§ 22-22-31 — 22-22-41 (2000); Term Code Annot §§…”
Gullickson v. Torkelson Bros., Inc., 1999 ND 155 (N.D. 1999). “5; R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 11-37.1-1 to 11-37.1-19; S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.