S.C. Code Ann. § 56-28-50

Presumption of attempts to conform; information to be provided to consumers; obligations of manufacturer; costs and attorney's fees; notice requirements

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section SC-LEGscstatehouse.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(A) It is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties if:

(1) the same nonconformity has been subject to repair three or more times by the manufacturer, or its agent, within the express warranty term, but the nonconformity continues to exist; or

(2) the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a cumulative total of thirty or more calendar days during the express warranty. The term of an express warranty, and the twenty-day period must be extended by any period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of a war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or other natural disaster.

(B) The manufacturer must provide information regarding consumer complaint remedies with each new motor vehicle. It is the responsibility of the consumer, or his representative, before availing himself of the provisions of this chapter, to give written notification to the manufacturer of the need for the repair of the nonconformity, in order to allow the manufacturer a final opportunity to cure the alleged defect if the manufacturer has clearly and prominently informed the consumer of the requirement of written notification to the manufacturer at the time of sale. The manufacturer, within ten business days, must notify the consumer of a reasonably accessible repair facility of a franchised new vehicle dealer to conform the new vehicle to the express warranty. After delivery of the new vehicle to an authorized repair facility by the consumer, the manufacturer must attempt immediately to repair the vehicle within a period not to exceed ten business days in order to conform the new motor vehicle to the express warranty. If the manufacturer is unable to repair properly the vehicle within the final ten-business-day period, the manufacturer must replace the vehicle with an identical or reasonably equivalent vehicle or refund the purchase price subject to the provisions of Section 56-28-40.

(C) Upon notification from the consumer that the new vehicle has not been conformed to the express warranty, the manufacturer shall inform the consumer if an informal dispute settlement procedure has been established by the manufacturer as enumerated in Section 56-28-60. However, if prior notice by the manufacturer of an informal dispute settlement procedure has been given, no further notice is required.

(D) Any consumer who finally prevails in any action brought under this chapter, may be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of cost and expenses (including attorney's fees based on actual time expended) and other such costs which are directly attributable to the nonconformity of the motor vehicle determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the plaintiff for or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action, unless the court in its discretion determines that such an award of attorney's fees would be inappropriate.

(E) All written notifications required by this section shall be sent by registered, certified, or express mail.

HISTORY: 1989 Act No. 142, SECTION 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Rita R. Greenawalt v. Nissan North America, Inc.
Rita R. Greenawalt v. Nissan North America, Inc. (2025) scctapp · cites it 4× “§ 39-5-140 (a) (2023) (providing for an award of "reasonable attorney's fees and costs"); S.C. Code Ann. § 56-28-50 (D) (2018) (allowing, in the court's discretion, an award of attorney's fees "based on actual time expended" but "determined by the court to have…”
Tammy West v. American Honda Motor Company (2025) scctapp · cites it 3× “…award reasonable attorney's fees if the court deems an award appropriate. S.C. Code Ann. § 56-28-50 (D) (2018). The determination of a reasonable fee award "generally rests within the circuit court's discretion, and we will not disturb an award absent an abuse of…”
— S.C. Code Ann. § 56-28-50(D) — 2 cases
Rita R. Greenawalt v. Nissan North America, Inc. (2025) scctapp “§ 39-5-140 (a) (2023) (providing for an award of "reasonable attorney's fees and costs"); S.C. Code Ann. § 56-28-50 (D) (2018) (allowing, in the court's discretion, an award of attorney's fees "based on actual time expended" but "determined by the court to have…”
Tammy West v. American Honda Motor Company (2025) scctapp “…award reasonable attorney's fees if the court deems an award appropriate. S.C. Code Ann. § 56-28-50 (D) (2018). The determination of a reasonable fee award "generally rests within the circuit court's discretion, and we will not disturb an award absent an abuse of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.