Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-1-105 (2026)

Expenses and loss of service incident to injury to child

✓ current as of May 2026 Cite as: Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-1-105 (2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Code 1958, § 2803; Shan., § 4503; Code 1932, § 8630; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 20-105; Acts 1982, ch. 853, § 5.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2021 · leading case: Crystal BLACKWELL, as Next Friend to Jacob Blackwell, a Minor v. SKY HIGH SPORTS NASHVILLE OPERATIONS, LLC
Crystal BLACKWELL, as Next Friend to Jacob Blackwell, a Minor v. SKY HIGH SPORTS NASHVILLE OPERATIONS, LLC (2017) tennctapp · cites it 4× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-1-105 (a). Sky High argues that because Mother’s claims were extinguished by her valid and undisputed execution of the waiver and indemnification language in the release, any claim for pre-majority medical ■ expenses is likewise barred.”
Palanki Ex Rel. Palanki v. Vanderbilt University (2006) tennctapp · cites it 2× “Tennessee Code Annotated section 20-1-105 provides that a claim for medical expenses incurred by a minor during his or her minority does not belong to the minor, but rather to the minor’s parents.”
Grant v. Kia Motors Corp. (2016) tned · cites it 2× “2d at 469 (emphasis added); See also Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-1-105 (a) (“The father and mother of a minor child have equal rights to maintain an action for the expenses and the actual loss of service resulting from an injury to a minor child in the parents’ service or living in the…”
Still Ex Rel. Erlandson v. Baptist Hospital, Inc. (1988) tennctapp · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 20-1-105. This is consistent with the common law, though a statutory enactment.”
Bowers v. City of Chattanooga (1992) tennctapp · cites it 6× “, was entitled to recover as damages an amount in excess of his actual out-of-pocket expenses pertaining to his son’s injuries, notwithstanding the provisions of T.C.A. § 20-1-105; (3) plaintiffs Hudgins and Bowers, Sr.”
Kingston Neale B/N/F Dion Russell v. United Way of Greater Kingsport (2015) tennctapp · cites it 29× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-1-105 (b) (providing that when a minor child‟s parents are living apart and one parent “has exclusive legal custody,” the custodial parent has “the sole right to maintain an action for the expenses and the actual loss of service resulting from an injury…”
Michelle Rye v. Women's Care Center of Memphis, MPLLC d/b/a Ruch Clinic (2014) tennctapp · cites it 2× “”) (emphasis added); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-1-105 (stating that the parents of a minor child who sustains an injury have the right to maintain an action for the expenses related to that injury).”
Brittany Borngne Ex Rel. Miyona Hyter v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority (2021) “3d at 657 ; see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-1-105 (a) (2009).2 We concluded: “Son cannot maintain an action for pre-majority medical expenses that were paid or will be paid by his parents.”
Lindsay, Pamela, & John Taylor v. Al Beard/Southeastern Freight (2001) tennctapp “In addition, the Parents argue that their claims are derivative of Lindsay’s personal injury claim and, 1 Tennessee Code Annotated § 20-1-105(a) provides, “the father and mother of a minor child have equ al rights to ma intain an action for the expenses and the actual loss of…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-1-105(a) — 1 case
Lindsay, Pamela, & John Taylor v. Al Beard/Southeastern Freight (2001) tennctapp “In addition, the Parents argue that their claims are derivative of Lindsay’s personal injury claim and, 1 Tennessee Code Annotated § 20-1-105(a) provides, “the father and mother of a minor child have equ al rights to ma intain an action for the expenses and the actual loss of…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-1-105(b) — 1 case
Kingston Neale B/N/F Dion Russell v. United Way of Greater Kingsport (2015) tennctapp “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-1-105 (b) (providing that when a minor child‟s parents are living apart and one parent “has exclusive legal custody,” the custodial parent has “the sole right to maintain an action for the expenses and the actual loss of service resulting from an injury…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.