Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-3-101 (2026)
[For constitutionality, see Compiler's notes] Definitions - Maintenance and abatement of nuisance - Forfeiture of property - Payment of moneys from forfeiture into general funds
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) As used herein:
- (1) "Lewdness" includes all matter of lewd sexual conduct or live exhibition, and includes, but is not limited to, possession, sale or exhibition of any:
- (A) Obscene films or plate positives;
- (B) Films designed to be projected upon a screen for exhibition; or
- (C) Films or slides, either in negative or positive form, designed for projection on a screen for exhibition;
- (2) "Nuisance" means that which is declared to be a nuisance by other statutes, and, in addition, means:
- (A) Any place in or upon which lewdness, prostitution, promotion of prostitution, patronizing prostitution, unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors, unlawful sale of any regulated legend drug, narcotic, other controlled substance or controlled substance analogue, any sale or possession with intent to sell of drug paraphernalia, as defined by § 39-17-402, unlawful gambling, any sale, exhibition or possession of any material determined to be obscene or pornographic with intent to exhibit, sell, deliver or distribute matter or materials in violation of §§ 39-17-901 - 39-17-908, § 39-17-911, § 39-17-914, § 39-17-918, or §§ 39-17-1003 - 39-17-1005, quarreling, drunkenness, fighting, breaches of the peace are carried on or permitted, and personal property, contents, furniture, fixtures, equipment and stock used in or in connection with the conducting and maintaining any such place for any such purposes;
- (B) A criminal gang, as defined by § 40-35-121(a), that regularly engages in gang related conduct. "Gang related conduct" occurs when one (1) or more criminal gang member or members, as defined by § 40-35-121(a), regularly engages in the following:
- (i) Intimidating, harassing, threatening, stalking, provoking or assaulting any person;
- (ii) Possessing weapons prohibited under §§ 39-17-1302 and 39-17-1307, knowingly remaining in the presence of anyone who is in possession of such weapons, or knowingly remaining in the presence of such weapons;
- (iii) Unlawfully damaging, defacing or marking any public or private property of another or possessing tools for the purpose of unlawfully damaging, defacing or marking any public or private property of another;
- (iv) Selling, possessing, manufacturing or using any controlled substance, drug paraphernalia, as defined in § 39-17-402, or controlled substance analogue, as defined in § 39-17-454, knowingly remaining in the presence of anyone selling, possessing, manufacturing or using any controlled substance, controlled substance analogue or drug paraphernalia, knowingly remaining in the presence of any controlled substance, controlled substance analogue or drug paraphernalia, driving under the influence of any controlled substance or controlled substance analogue in violation of § 55-10-401, or being under the influence of any controlled substance or controlled substance analogue in public in violation of § 39-17-310;
- (v) Using, consuming, possessing or purchasing alcoholic beverages unlawfully, including, but not limited to, public intoxication in violation of § 39-17-310 or driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of § 55-10-401;
- (vi) Criminal trespassing in violation of § 39-14-405;
- (vii) Taking any action to recruit gang members or making any threats or promises to shoot, stab, strike, hit, assault, injure, disturb the peace or destroy the personal property of anyone as an incentive to join a gang;
- (viii) Taking any action to stop a gang member from leaving a gang or making any threats or promises to shoot, stab, strike, hit, assault, injure, disturb the peace or destroy the personal property of anyone as an incentive not to leave a gang;
- (ix) Engaging in a criminal gang offense as defined by § 40-35-121(a);
- (x) Disorderly conduct in violation of § 39-17-305; or
- (xi) Contributing to or encouraging the delinquency or unruly behavior of a minor in violation of § 37-1-156; or
- (C) Any place in or upon which a person knowingly takes, by defrauding, or conspiring or colluding with, the recipient of public assistance benefits funded in whole or in part by the federal government or state of Tennessee, any part of such benefits knowing the person is not authorized or entitled by law to receive the portion of benefits taken;
- (3) "Person" means and includes any individual, corporation, association, partnership, trustee, lessee, agent or assignee; and
- (4) "Place" means and includes any building, room enclosure or vehicle, or separate part or portion thereof or the ground itself and all the property on which the nuisance is located that is under the ownership, management or control of the violator.
- (1) "Lewdness" includes all matter of lewd sexual conduct or live exhibition, and includes, but is not limited to, possession, sale or exhibition of any:
- (b) Any person who uses, occupies, establishes or conducts a nuisance, or aids or abets therein, and the owner, agent or lessee of any interest in any such nuisance, together with the persons employed in or in control of any such nuisance by any such owner, agent or lessee, is guilty of maintaining a nuisance and such nuisance shall be abated as provided hereinafter.
- (c) All motor vehicles, furnishings, fixtures, equipment, moneys and stock, used in or in connection with the maintaining or conducting of a nuisance, are subject to seizure, immediately upon detection by any law enforcement officer and are subject to forfeiture to the state by order of a court having jurisdiction upon application by any of the officers or persons authorized by § 29-3-102, to bring action for the abatement of such nuisance; provided, that seizure for the possession of obscene matter shall be in accordance with §§ 39-17-901 - 39-17-908 and seizure for violations of §§ 39-17-1003 - 39-17-1005 shall be in accordance with §§ 39-17-1006 and 39-17-1007. Any property so forfeited shall be disposed of by public auction or as otherwise provided by law.
- (d) All moneys from such forfeiture and all proceeds realized from the enforcement of this section shall be paid equally into the general funds of the state and the general funds of the political subdivision or other public agency, if any, whose officers made the seizure, except as otherwise provided by law.
- (e)
- (1) Upon a person's second or subsequent conviction for promoting prostitution or patronizing prostitution, any vehicle in which such offense was committed is subject to seizure and forfeiture in accordance with the procedure established in title 39, chapter 11, part 7; provided, however, that nothing contained within this subsection (e) shall be construed to authorize seizure of such vehicle at any time prior to such conviction.
- (2) Subdivision (e)(1) applies only if the violations making the vehicle subject to seizure and forfeiture occur in Tennessee and at least one (1) of the previous violations occurs on or after July 1, 2002, and the second or subsequent offense after July 1, 2002, occurs within five (5) years of the most recent prior offense occurring after July 1, 2002.
Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 631, s 1, eff. 7/1/2014.
Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 247, s 1, eff. 7/1/2013.
Acts 1913 (2nd Ex.Sess.), ch. 2, § 1; Shan., § 5164a1; Code 1932, § 9324; Acts 1943, ch. 118, § 1; C. Supp. 1950, § 9324; Acts 1973, ch. 277, §§ 1-4; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 23-301; Acts 1990, ch. 1092, § 8; 2002, ch. 847, §§ 1 - 3; 2006, ch. 763, §§1, 2; 2009 , ch. 571, §1; 2012 , ch. 848, § 7.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1993–2023 · leading case: Davis-Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. McWherter, 866 S.W.2d 520 (Tenn. 1993).
Davis-Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. McWherter, 866 S.W.2d 520 (Tenn. 1993). “The 1990 amendment to Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-3-101 includes within the definition of "nuisance" "any place in or upon which any sale, exhibition or possession of any material determined to be obscene or pornographic with intent to exhibit, sell, deliver or distribute matter or…”
State v. Phillips, 138 S.W.3d 224 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “The forfeiture proceedings incident to the abatement of a public nuisance, found in Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-3-101, -111 (2000 & Supp.”
State Ex Rel. Dean v. Nelson, 169 S.W.3d 648 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Dean, the Director of Law for the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, filed a petition in the Criminal Court for Davidson County to abate Madam X as a public nuisance under Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-3-101 to -115 (2000 *650 & Supp.”
State ex rel. Gibbons v. Jackson, 16 S.W.3d 797 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “3) Whether “lewdness” and “obscenity” have been elided from the Tennessee Nuisance statute, T.C.A §§ 29-3-101 et seq., and, if not, whether the inclusion of those terms makes the statute unconstitutionally overbroad or void for vagueness.”
Town of Nolensville v. King, 151 S.W.3d 427 (Tenn. 2004). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-3-101 et. seq. (2000).”
King of Clubs v. William Gibbons, 9 S.W.3d 796 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “An order that the provisions in T.C.A. 29-3-101 permitting a petition for nuisance abatement because of obscene conduct so as to enjoin any future obscene conduct is a prior restraint and said provisions of the nuisance statute are unconstitutional on their face or as applied to…”
Tennessee Ex Rel. Pierotti v. a Parcel of Real Prop. Municipally Known as 777 N. White Station Road, 937 F. Supp. 1296 (W.D. Tenn. 1996). “9 REMOVAL TO FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT, Prior To Plaintiff’s Motion To Withdraw All Federal Claims Plaintiffs complaints for declaratory judgments, as structured before the second amendment, bring a series of claims, most significantly, under the Tennessee Nuisance Act, T.C.A. §…”
Cooper v. Parrish, 20 F. Supp. 2d 1204 (W.D. Tenn. 1998). “FACTS Possibly as early as December of 1995, Defendant Pierotti, with the assistance of Parrish, Weirich, and Nichols prepared legal actions pursuant to Tennessee’s nuisance statute, Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-3-101, 105, against several Shelby County nightclubs offering nude or semi…”
State of Tennessee, City of Memphis, Tennessee v. Georgette Brooks (Tenn. Ct. App. 2023). “No animal or fowl shall be kept in such a place or condition as to become a nuisance either because of odor or contagion. Memphis, Tenn. Ordinances § 5-2 (1985).”
State v. John Phillips (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “The forfeiture proceedings incident to the abatement of a public nuisance, found in Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-3-101 , -111 (2000 & Supp.”
Roane Cnty., Tennessee v. The Tennessee Valley Auth. (TV1) (E.D. Tenn. 2020). “T.C.A. § 29-3-101(a)(2). Instead of identifying the statutory definition of nuisance they rely upon for their statutory public nuisance claim, however, Plaintiffs cite to the common law definition of 17 nuisance [Doc.”
State of Tennessee ex rel. William L. Gibbons, Dist. Attorney Gen. v. Club Universe (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-3-101 (2) (2000). 2 By agreement of the parties, the matter was continued until August 11, 2004.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-3-101(2) — 2 cases
State ex rel. Gibbons v. Jackson, 16 S.W.3d 797 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “3) Whether “lewdness” and “obscenity” have been elided from the Tennessee Nuisance statute, T.C.A §§ 29-3-101 et seq., and, if not, whether the inclusion of those terms makes the statute unconstitutionally overbroad or void for vagueness.”
State of Tennessee, ex rel, William L. Gibbons v. Sherrod Jackson, Robert Williams, Nathaniel Williams, Mike Williams, Shirley Blalock, & Steven Craig Cooper (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-3-101(a)(2) — 2 cases
Davis-Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. McWherter, 866 S.W.2d 520 (Tenn. 1993). “The 1990 amendment to Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-3-101 includes within the definition of "nuisance" "any place in or upon which any sale, exhibition or possession of any material determined to be obscene or pornographic with intent to exhibit, sell, deliver or distribute matter or…”
Roane Cnty., Tennessee v. The Tennessee Valley Auth. (TV1) (E.D. Tenn. 2020). “T.C.A. § 29-3-101(a)(2). Instead of identifying the statutory definition of nuisance they rely upon for their statutory public nuisance claim, however, Plaintiffs cite to the common law definition of 17 nuisance [Doc.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-3-101(b) — 1 case
Roane Cnty., Tennessee v. The Tennessee Valley Auth. (TV1) (E.D. Tenn. 2020). “T.C.A. § 29-3-101(a)(2). Instead of identifying the statutory definition of nuisance they rely upon for their statutory public nuisance claim, however, Plaintiffs cite to the common law definition of 17 nuisance [Doc.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-3-101(c) — 3 cases
State v. Phillips, 138 S.W.3d 224 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “The forfeiture proceedings incident to the abatement of a public nuisance, found in Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-3-101, -111 (2000 & Supp.”
Davis-Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. McWherter, 866 S.W.2d 520 (Tenn. 1993). “The 1990 amendment to Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-3-101 includes within the definition of "nuisance" "any place in or upon which any sale, exhibition or possession of any material determined to be obscene or pornographic with intent to exhibit, sell, deliver or distribute matter or…”
King of Clubs v. William Gibbons, 9 S.W.3d 796 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “An order that the provisions in T.C.A. 29-3-101 permitting a petition for nuisance abatement because of obscene conduct so as to enjoin any future obscene conduct is a prior restraint and said provisions of the nuisance statute are unconstitutional on their face or as applied to…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-3-101(e) — 2 cases
State v. Phillips, 138 S.W.3d 224 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “The forfeiture proceedings incident to the abatement of a public nuisance, found in Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-3-101, -111 (2000 & Supp.”
Cooper v. Parrish, 20 F. Supp. 2d 1204 (W.D. Tenn. 1998). “FACTS Possibly as early as December of 1995, Defendant Pierotti, with the assistance of Parrish, Weirich, and Nichols prepared legal actions pursuant to Tennessee’s nuisance statute, Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-3-101, 105, against several Shelby County nightclubs offering nude or semi…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.