Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-1-106

Nuncupative will

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1941, ch. 125, § 6; C. Supp. 1950, § 8098.6; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 32-106.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2021 · leading case: In Re Estate of Boote
In Re Estate of Boote (2005) tennctapp · cites it 8× “§§ 32-1-105 (2001), 32-1-110 (2001) (holographic wills); Tenn.Code Ann. § 32-1-106 (2001) (nuncupative wills); 1 PRITCHARD § 4, at 7-8.”
In Re Estate of Joseph Owen Boote, Jr. (2005) tennctapp · cites it 6× “§§ 32-1-105 (2001), 32-1-110 (2001) (holographic wills); Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-1-106 (2001) (nuncupative wills); 1 PRITCHARD § 4, at 7-8.”
State of Tennessee v. Ricky L. Helmick, Jr. (2021) tenncrimapp · cites it 2× “Helmick for the purpose of inheritance under Code section 32-1-106(b). Moreover, the jury considered the theft and murder charges simultaneously.”
Robert W. Mills v. Nita D. Mills (2015) tennctapp · cites it 2× “§ 32-1-105 (requiring ―the signature and all its material provisions must be in the handwriting of the testator and the testator's handwriting must be proved by two (2) witnesses‖ to prove a holographic will); Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-1-106 (requiring for a valid nuncupative will,…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-1-106(a) — 1 case
In Re Estate of Boote (2005) tennctapp “§§ 32-1-105 (2001), 32-1-110 (2001) (holographic wills); Tenn.Code Ann. § 32-1-106 (2001) (nuncupative wills); 1 PRITCHARD § 4, at 7-8.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-1-106(a)(2) — 1 case
In Re Estate of Boote (2005) tennctapp “§§ 32-1-105 (2001), 32-1-110 (2001) (holographic wills); Tenn.Code Ann. § 32-1-106 (2001) (nuncupative wills); 1 PRITCHARD § 4, at 7-8.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-1-106(b) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Ricky L. Helmick, Jr. (2021) tenncrimapp “Helmick for the purpose of inheritance under Code section 32-1-106(b). Moreover, the jury considered the theft and murder charges simultaneously.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.