Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-4-105 (2026)

Proof of will - Presumption of suspicious circumstances

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 942, s 1, eff. 7/1/2022.

Code 1858, § 2178 (deriv. Acts 1789, ch. 23, § 1); Shan., § 3910; Code 1932, § 8108; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 32-406.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: In Re Est. of Gertrude Bible Link, 542 S.W.3d 438 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Est. of Gertrude Bible Link, 542 S.W.3d 438 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-4-105 (2015). Once the proponent presents proof showing that the will was executed in compliance with the legal formalities, the will is presumed to be valid, and the burden shifts to the contestant to demonstrate that the will is invalid for some reason.”
Jackson v. Patton, 952 S.W.2d 404 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-4-105 ; Jones v. Arterburn, 30 Tenn.”
William Kenneth Wade v. Robert Crosslin (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 5× “at *4; Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-4-105 . Hence, because neither attesting witness appeared before the trial court, the burden of proving that Ms.”
In Re Est. of Adam Randall Wilson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 4× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-4-105 (a). “The issue may be tried by a jury, and their verdict, and the judgment of the court upon the validity of the will shall be certified to the court having probate jurisdiction over the will to be recorded together with the original will, if…”
In Re Est. of Charles Edward Fant, III (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Additionally, the trial court explicitly referenced the notes to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 32-4-105 regarding the proof of wills stating that capacity is presumed unless there are suspicious circumstances.”
In the Matter of the Est. of Dennis R. Woolverton (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-4-105 (2013)(emphasis added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-4-105(a) — 1 case
William Kenneth Wade v. Robert Crosslin (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). “at *4; Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-4-105 . Hence, because neither attesting witness appeared before the trial court, the burden of proving that Ms.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.