Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-606 (2026)

Electronic tracking of motor vehicles

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 860,s 2, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 860,s 1, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 790,s 1, eff. 7/1/2014.

Acts 1997, ch. 339, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: Aegis Investigative Grp. v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 98 S.W.3d 159 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
Aegis Investigative Grp. v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 98 S.W.3d 159 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “Metro held the device as potential evidence in a stalking and illegal use investigation and notified the Murfreesboro Police Department of a possible violation of Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-606. No charges were placed against Aegis.”
Commonwealth v. Brennan, 112 N.E.3d 1180 (Mass. 2018). “Laws § 11-69-1 (person may not knowingly install tracking device in or on motor vehicle without consent of all owners and occupants of vehicle for purpose of monitoring or following occupant); Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-606 (person may not knowingly install tracking device in or on…”
Ashley Shearin Meade v. Paducah Nissan, LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 14× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-606 (a)(1). The term “lease” as it is used in section 39-13-606 is defined as “the grant of use and possession of a motor vehicle for consideration, whether or not the grant includes an option to buy the vehicle[.”
Long v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee (M.D. Tenn. 2022). “§ 39-13-606 ; and violating an order of protection, a misdemeanor, in violation of Tenn.”
John William Owens Et.al v. Meredith Elizabeth Owens (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). “On August 29, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary nonsuit of the following claims: (1) violation of Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-13-606 (involving Ms. Owens’s use of a tracking device), (2) intentional/negligent infliction of emotional distress, (3) defamation, and (4)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.