Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-503 (2026)

Gambling promotion

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1996–2004 · leading case: United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) & Donald Wall (95-5008), 92 F.3d 1444 (6th Cir. 1996).
United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) & Donald Wall (95-5008), 92 F.3d 1444 (6th Cir. 1996). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-503 (a). "Gambling” is defined as “risking anything of value for a profit whose return is to any degree contingent on chance.”
State of Tennessee v. George Arvil Vance & Vincent Vance (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-503 (a). The Defendants assert that they did not knowingly commit aggravated gambling promotion because they believed that the Free Spin machines were legal under the gambling statutes and they displayed the machines “in the main, public areas” of the…”
State of Tennessee v. Donald Ray Lovell (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-503 . -8- In the present case, the officers went to 2602 Belmont Boulevard in response to a 911 call regarding an armed robbery.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.