Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (2026)

Judicial review

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)
- (1) A person who is aggrieved by a final decision in a contested case is entitled to judicial review under this chapter, which shall be the only available method of judicial review. A preliminary, procedural or intermediate agency action or ruling is immediately reviewable if review of the final agency decision would not provide an adequate remedy.
- (2) A state agency is considered to be an aggrieved person for the purpose of judicial review when the order is from a board, commission or other entity independent of the aggrieved agency. In such instances, judicial review under this chapter is permitted upon the request of the agency head and the approval of the attorney general and reporter.

(b)
- (1)
  - (A)
    - (i) Proceedings for review are instituted by filing a petition for review in chancery court.
    - (ii) Except as provided in subdivisions (b)(1)(B), venue for appeals of contested case hearings shall be in the chancery court nearest to the place of residence of the person contesting the agency action or alternatively, at the person's discretion, in the chancery court nearest to the place where the cause of action arose, or in the chancery court of Davidson County.
    - (iii) Venue for appeals of contested case hearings involving TennCare determinations shall be in the chancery court of Davidson County.
    - (iv) Petitions seeking judicial review shall be filed within sixty (60) days after the entry of the agency's final order thereon.
  - (B)
    - (i) A person who is aggrieved by a final decision of the department of human services or the department of children's services in a contested case may file a petition for review in the chancery court located either in the county of the official residence of the appropriate commissioner or in the county in which any one (1) or more of the petitioners reside.
    - (ii) A person who is aggrieved by the final determination of a hearing officer or local board of education in a special education hearing conducted pursuant to § 49-10-606 may file a petition for review in the chancery court of Davidson County or, alternatively, in the county in which the petitioner resides.
    - (iii) A person who is aggrieved by any final decision of the Tennessee public utility commission, or by a final decision of the state board of equalization in a contested case involving centrally assessed utility property assessed in accordance with title 67, chapter 5, part 13, shall file any petition for review with the middle division of the court of appeals.
- (2) In a case in which a petition for judicial review is submitted within the sixty-day period but is filed with an inappropriate court, the case shall be transferred to the appropriate court. The time for filing a petition for review in a court as provided in this chapter shall not be extended because of the period of time allotted for filing with the agency a petition for reconsideration. Copies of the petition shall be served upon the agency and all parties of record, including the attorney general and reporter, in accordance with the provisions of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure pertaining to service of process.

(c) The filing of the petition for review does not itself stay enforcement of the agency decision. The agency may grant, or the reviewing court may order, a stay upon appropriate terms, but if it is shown to the satisfaction of the reviewing court, in a hearing that shall be held within ten (10) days of a request for hearing by either party, that any party or the public at large may suffer injury by reason of the granting of a stay, then no stay shall be granted until a good and sufficient bond, in an amount fixed and approved by the court, shall be given by the petitioner conditioned to indemnify the other persons who might be so injured and if no bond amount is sufficient, the stay shall be denied. The reviewing court shall not consider a stay unless notice has been given to the attorney general and reporter; nor shall the reviewing court consider a stay unless the petitioner has previously sought a stay from the agency or demonstrates that an agency ruling on a stay application cannot be obtained within a reasonable time.

(d) Within forty-five (45) days after service of the petition, or within further time allowed by the court, the agency shall transmit to the reviewing court the original or a certified copy of the entire record of the proceeding under review. By stipulation of all the parties of the review proceedings, the record may be shortened. A party unreasonably refusing to stipulate to limit the record may be taxed by the court for the additional cost. The court may require or permit subsequent corrections or additions to the record.

(e) If, before the date set for hearing, application is made to the court for leave to present additional evidence, and it is shown to the satisfaction of the court that the additional evidence is material and that there were good reasons for failure to present it in the proceeding before the agency, the court may order that the additional evidence be taken before the agency upon conditions determined by the court. The agency may modify its findings and decision by reason of the additional evidence and shall file that evidence and any modifications, new findings or decisions with the reviewing court.

(f) The procedure ordinarily followed in the reviewing court will be followed in the review of contested cases decided by the agency, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. The agency that issued the decision to be reviewed is not required to file a responsive pleading.

(g) The review shall be conducted by the court without a jury and shall be confined to the record. In cases of alleged irregularities in procedure before the agency, not shown in the record, proof thereon may be taken in the court.

(h) The court may affirm the decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings. The court may reverse or modify the decision if the rights of the petitioner have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions or decisions are:
- (1) In violation of constitutional or statutory provisions;
- (2) In excess of the statutory authority of the agency;
- (3) Made upon unlawful procedure;
- (4) Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion; or
- (5)
  - (A)
    - (i) Except as provided in subdivision (h)(5)(B), unsupported by evidence that is both substantial and material in the light of the entire record;
    - (ii) In determining the substantiality of evidence, the court shall take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight, but the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact;
  - (B)
    - (i) Unsupported by a preponderance of the evidence in light of the entire record, if the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions were made by a board, council, committee, agency, or regulatory program created pursuant to title 63, chapters 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31;
    - (ii) In determining whether the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are supported by a preponderance of the evidence, the court shall take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight, but the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact.

(i) No agency decision pursuant to a hearing in a contested case shall be reversed, remanded or modified by the reviewing court unless for errors that affect the merits of such decision.

(j) The reviewing court shall reduce its findings of fact and conclusions of law to writing and make them parts of the record.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 461, s 4, eff. 5/18/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 107, s 44, eff. 4/11/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1021, s 1, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 94, s 3, eff. 4/4/2017.

Acts 1974, ch. 725, § 17; 1975, ch. 370, § 6; 1978, ch. 815, § 1; 1978, ch. 938, § 13; T.C.A., § 4-523; Acts 1980, ch. 478, § 1; T.C.A., § 4-5-117; Acts 1982, ch. 874, § 63; 1986, ch. 738, § 2; 1995, ch. 305, § 68; 2002, ch. 610, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 572 cases (66 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Davis v. Shelby Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 278 S.W.3d 256 (Tenn. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Davis v. Shelby Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 278 S.W.3d 256 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 24× “However, in 1988, the General Assembly amended the language of section 27-9-114 to read, in pertinent part, “Judicial review of decisions by civil service boards of a county or municipality which affects the employment status of a county or city civil service employee shall be…”

Richardson v. Tennessee Bd. of Dentistry, 913 S.W.2d 446 (Tenn. 1995). · cites it 21× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (1995 Supp.). B Next, we must consider whether the Davidson County Chancery Court was authorized to resolve constitutional issues which were raised but not resolved in a contested case proceeding.”

McEwen v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf., 173 S.W.3d 815 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 18× “The trial court, however, assessed the sufficiency of the State’s evidence using the “substantial and material evidence” standard in Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (h)(5) (Supp.2004).”

Jones v. Bureau of TennCare, 94 S.W.3d 495 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 19× “§ 4-5-322, Jones timely appealed the Final Administrative Order to Davidson County Chancery Court.”

Starlink Logistics, Inc. v. ACC, LLC, 494 S.W.3d 659 (Tenn. 2016). · cites it 14× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (h)(5)(B). An appellate court applies the same limited standard-of review, as the trial court.”

Davis v. Tennessee Dep't of Emp. Sec., 23 S.W.3d 304 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 20× “Davis's petition for review under Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (1998) in August 1996.”

Hughley v. State, 208 S.W.3d 388 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 25× “Judicial review of decisions in contested cases is governed by section 4-5-322, see id. § 4-5-322(a)(l) (Supp.”

Martin v. Sizemore, 78 S.W.3d 249 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 10× “Likewise, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 4-5-322, -323 (1998) provide for judicial review of decisions in contested cases as of right at both the trial and appellate level.”

Dennis J. Hughes v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee, 259 S.W.3d 631 (Tenn. 2008). · cites it 12× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (a)(1), (h)(1)-(5)(A) (2005).”

Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 263 S.W.3d 827 (Tenn. 2008). · cites it 7× “§ 4-5-225, with Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (2005 & Supp.2007).”

City of Memphis v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 238 S.W.3d 238 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 12× “The application of these provisions requires compliance with the standards of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act (UAPA), including the judicial standards of review set forth in Tennessee Code Section 4-5-322. Tenn. Code Ann. § 27-9-114 (b)(1) (2000).”

Tennessee Env't Council v. Water Quality Control Bd., 250 S.W.3d 44 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 17× “This dispute arose in 2002 when environmental groups filed a Petition for Judicial Review under Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-5-322 of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act seeking to reverse the grant of a wastewater discharge permit to the City of Spencer, Tennessee.”

Show all 572 citing cases →

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(4) — 1 case

Madison Cnty., Tennessee v. Vatisha Evans-Barken (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(5)(B) — 1 case

Robertson v. Tennessee Bd. of Soc. Worker Certification & Licensure, 227 S.W.3d 7 (Tenn. 2007).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(5)(b) — 1 case

Daniel A. RILEY, C.N.A. v. John DREYZEHNER, M.D., in His Off. Capacity as Comm'r of the Tennessee Dep't of Health, 398 S.W.3d 182 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(a) — 7 cases

Penney Mosley v. City of Memphis (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).

Tennessee Dep't of Saf. & Homeland Sec. v. David Shell (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).

Hyundai Motor Am. v. Tennessee Motor Veh. Comm'n (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).

E. Ron Pickard & Linda Pickard, as Trs. of the Sharon Charitable Trust & as Individuals v. Tennessee Dep't of Env't & Conservation, Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd. & Tennessee Materials Corp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(a)(1) — 26 cases

Joseph Edward Rich, M.D. v. Tennessee Bd. of Med. Examiners, 350 S.W.3d 919 (Tenn. 2011).

Tennessee Env't Council v. Water Quality Control Bd., 250 S.W.3d 44 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “This dispute arose in 2002 when environmental groups filed a Petition for Judicial Review under Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-5-322 of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act seeking to reverse the grant of a wastewater discharge permit to the City of Spencer, Tennessee.”

Helms v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf., 987 S.W.2d 545 (Tenn. 1999).

State Ex Rel. Comm'r of the Dep't of Transp. v. Thomas, 336 S.W.3d 588 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).

Miller v. Tennessee Bd. of Nursing, 256 S.W.3d 225 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(a)(2) — 2 cases

Bobby Watts, M.D. v. John H. Burkhart, M.D., 854 F.2d 839 (6th Cir. 1988).

Stone Fort Land Co. v. The Tennessee Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Bd. - Concurring (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(a)(l) — 15 cases

Martin v. Sizemore, 78 S.W.3d 249 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Likewise, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 4-5-322, -323 (1998) provide for judicial review of decisions in contested cases as of right at both the trial and appellate level.”

Richardson v. Tennessee Bd. of Dentistry, 913 S.W.2d 446 (Tenn. 1995). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (1995 Supp.). B Next, we must consider whether the Davidson County Chancery Court was authorized to resolve constitutional issues which were raised but not resolved in a contested case proceeding.”

Dennis J. Hughes v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee, 259 S.W.3d 631 (Tenn. 2008). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (a)(1), (h)(1)-(5)(A) (2005).”

Patterson v. Tennessee Dep't of Labor & Workforce Dev., 60 S.W.3d 60 (Tenn. 2001).

Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Love, 256 S.W.3d 644 (Tenn. 2008).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(b) — 13 cases

Schering-Plough Healthcare Prods., Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 999 S.W.2d 773 (Tenn. 1999).

Gluck v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 15 S.W.3d 486 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

HRA, Inc. v. Tennessee Dep't of Com. & Ins., 914 S.W.2d 512 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995).

Bobby Watts, M.D. v. John H. Burkhart, M.D., 854 F.2d 839 (6th Cir. 1988).

United Steelworkers of Am. v. Tennessee Air Pollution Control Bd., 3 S.W.3d 468 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(b)(1) — 21 cases

Davis v. Tennessee Dep't of Emp. Sec., 23 S.W.3d 304 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Davis's petition for review under Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (1998) in August 1996.”

Hawkins v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 127 S.W.3d 749 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).

Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 263 S.W.3d 827 (Tenn. 2008). “§ 4-5-225, with Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (2005 & Supp.2007).”

Hughley v. State, 208 S.W.3d 388 (Tenn. 2006). “Judicial review of decisions in contested cases is governed by section 4-5-322, see id. § 4-5-322(a)(l) (Supp.”

Bishop v. Tennessee Dept. of Corr., 896 S.W.2d 557 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(b)(1)(1998) — 1 case

Frazier v. Whisman (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(b)(1)(A) — 8 cases

Xcaliber Int'l, Ltd. v. Gerregano, 290 F. Supp. 3d 747 (M.D. Tenn. 2018).

Joseph Skernivitz v. State of Tennessee Dep't of Saf. & Homeland Sec. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).

Tennessee Dep't of Saf. ex rel. Charles A. Harmon v. Carltone E. Bryant, IV (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).

Vanessa Berlanga v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf. & Homeland Sec. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).

Leslie K. Jones v. Andy L. Allman (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(b)(1)(A)(i) — 1 case

Abraham A. Augustin v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf. & Homeland Sec. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(b)(1)(A)(ii) — 1 case

Thomas Marlin Roberts v. Tennessee Dep't of Env't & Conservation (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(b)(1)(A)(iv) — 1 case

Genesis Roofing Co. v. Tennessee Occupational Saf. & Health Admin. Review Comm'n (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(b)(1)(B)(iii) — 2 cases

Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 263 S.W.3d 827 (Tenn. 2008). “§ 4-5-225, with Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (2005 & Supp.2007).”

Volunteer Princess Cruises, LLC v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(b)(2) — 7 cases

United Steelworkers of Am. v. Tennessee Air Pollution Control Bd., 3 S.W.3d 468 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Davis v. Tennessee Dep't of Emp. Sec., 23 S.W.3d 304 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Davis's petition for review under Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (1998) in August 1996.”

Brigham v. Lack, 755 S.W.2d 469 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1988).

Schering Healthcare v. St. Bd. Equalization (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Abraham Asley Augustin v. Bradley Cnty. Sheriff's Off. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(b)(l) — 11 cases

Hughley v. State, 208 S.W.3d 388 (Tenn. 2006). “Judicial review of decisions in contested cases is governed by section 4-5-322, see id. § 4-5-322(a)(l) (Supp.”

Davis v. Tennessee Dep't of Emp. Sec., 23 S.W.3d 304 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Davis's petition for review under Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (1998) in August 1996.”

Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Tennessee Regulatory Auth., 79 S.W.3d 506 (Tenn. 2002).

Kilby v. Sivley, 745 S.W.2d 284 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987).

In re Show Cause Proceeding to Amend the Billing & Collection Tariffs of South Cent. Bell, 779 S.W.2d 375 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(b)(l)(A) — 2 cases

Starlink Logistics, Inc. v. ACC, LLC, 494 S.W.3d 659 (Tenn. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (h)(5)(B). An appellate court applies the same limited standard-of review, as the trial court.”

Christopher Furlough v. Spherion Atl. Workforce, LLC, 397 S.W.3d 114 (Tenn. 2013).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(bXl) — 1 case

Jackson Mobilphone Co. v. Tennessee Pub. Serv. Comm., 876 S.W.2d 106 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(c) — 1 case

Fred H. Wright, Ph.D. v. Tennessee Bd. of Examiners in Psychology (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(d) — 5 cases

United Steelworkers of Am. v. Tennessee Air Pollution Control Bd., 3 S.W.3d 468 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Kendrick v. City of Chattanooga Firemen's & Policemen's Ins. & Pension Fund Bd., 799 S.W.2d 668 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990).

Sandi D. Jackson v. Tennessee Bd. of Nursing (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).

Sherrie L. Durham v. Tennessee Dep't of Labor & Workforce Dev. by & through James Neeley in his Off. Capacity (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).

Cnty. of Shelby, A Political Subdivision of the State of Tennessee v. John R. Tompkins (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(d)(2005) — 1 case

Cnty. of Shelby v. Tompkins, 241 S.W.3d 500 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(e) — 8 cases

Jones v. Bureau of TennCare, 94 S.W.3d 495 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “§ 4-5-322, Jones timely appealed the Final Administrative Order to Davidson County Chancery Court.”

Helms v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf., 987 S.W.2d 545 (Tenn. 1999).

State of Tennessee v. Charles D. Sprunger, 458 S.W.3d 482 (Tenn. 2015).

Jones v. Greene, 946 S.W.2d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).

Goins v. Univ. of Tennessee Mem'l Rsch. Ctr. & Hosp. at Knoxville, 821 S.W.2d 942 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(e)(2011) — 1 case

Richard Barrom v. City of Memphis Civil Serv. Comm'n (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(f) — 1 case

In re Show Cause Proceeding to Amend the Billing & Collection Tariffs of South Cent. Bell, 779 S.W.2d 375 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(g) — 31 cases

Cooper v. Williamson Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 746 S.W.2d 176 (Tenn. 1987).

MacOn v. Shelby Cnty. Gov't Civil Serv. Merit Bd., 309 S.W.3d 504 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).

City of Memphis v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 216 S.W.3d 311 (Tenn. 2007).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h) — 186 cases

Jones v. Bureau of TennCare, 94 S.W.3d 495 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “§ 4-5-322, Jones timely appealed the Final Administrative Order to Davidson County Chancery Court.”

Starlink Logistics, Inc. v. ACC, LLC, 494 S.W.3d 659 (Tenn. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (h)(5)(B). An appellate court applies the same limited standard-of review, as the trial court.”

Dennis J. Hughes v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee, 259 S.W.3d 631 (Tenn. 2008). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (a)(1), (h)(1)-(5)(A) (2005).”

City of Memphis v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 216 S.W.3d 311 (Tenn. 2007).

McEwen v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf., 173 S.W.3d 815 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “The trial court, however, assessed the sufficiency of the State’s evidence using the “substantial and material evidence” standard in Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322 (h)(5) (Supp.2004).”

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(1) — 19 cases

Beare Co. v. Tennessee Dep't of Revenue, 858 S.W.2d 906 (Tenn. 1993).

Davis v. Shelby Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 278 S.W.3d 256 (Tenn. 2009). “However, in 1988, the General Assembly amended the language of section 27-9-114 to read, in pertinent part, “Judicial review of decisions by civil service boards of a county or municipality which affects the employment status of a county or city civil service employee shall be…”

Jones v. Bureau of TennCare, 94 S.W.3d 495 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “§ 4-5-322, Jones timely appealed the Final Administrative Order to Davidson County Chancery Court.”

Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Allison, 284 S.W.3d 316 (Tenn. 2009).

Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Tennessee Regulatory Auth., 79 S.W.3d 506 (Tenn. 2002).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(1)(4) — 1 case

Larry Robbins v. City of Johnson City, Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(1998) — 1 case

Youth Programs, Inc. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 170 S.W.3d 92 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(2) — 5 cases

Wayne Cnty. v. Tennessee Solid Waste Disposal Control Bd., 756 S.W.2d 274 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988).

Cnty. of Shelby v. Tompkins, 241 S.W.3d 500 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).

Miller v. Civil Serv. Com'n, 271 S.W.3d 659 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).

Miller v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of the Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 271 S.W.3d 659 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).

City of Memphis, a Mun. Corp. v. The Civil Serv. Comm'n of the City of Memphis & Tommy Moore (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(2001) — 2 cases

Erik Maasikas v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).

Arthur Lynn v. Randy Camp (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(3) — 5 cases

Miller v. Civil Serv. Com'n, 271 S.W.3d 659 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).

Miller v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of the Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 271 S.W.3d 659 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).

Fred H. Wright, Ph.D. v. Tennessee Bd. of Examiners in Psychology (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

Maurice Fitten v. The City Council of The City of Chattanooga (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).

Off. of the Attorney Gen., Consum. Advocate & Prot. Div. v. Tennessee Regulatory Auth. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(4) — 23 cases

City of Memphis v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 238 S.W.3d 238 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The application of these provisions requires compliance with the standards of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act (UAPA), including the judicial standards of review set forth in Tennessee Code Section 4-5-322. Tenn. Code Ann. § 27-9-114 (b)(1) (2000).”

Jackson Mobilphone Co. v. Tennessee Pub. Serv. Comm., 876 S.W.2d 106 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993).

Miller v. Civil Serv. Com'n, 271 S.W.3d 659 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).

Mosley v. Tennessee Dep't of Com. & Ins., 167 S.W.3d 308 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(4)(2005) — 1 case

Paul Pittman v. City of Memphis, 360 S.W.3d 382 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(5) — 38 cases

Wayne Cnty. v. Tennessee Solid Waste Disposal Control Bd., 756 S.W.2d 274 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988).

Jackson Mobilphone Co. v. Tennessee Pub. Serv. Comm., 876 S.W.2d 106 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993).

Miller v. Tennessee Bd. of Nursing, 256 S.W.3d 225 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).

S. Ry. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196 (Tenn. 1984).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(5)(2005) — 1 case

State of Tennessee Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. Eddie Davis (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(5)(A) — 3 cases

Paul J. Walwyn v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility Of The Supreme Court of Tennessee, 481 S.W.3d 151 (Tenn. 2015).

Mitchell v. Madison Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 325 S.W.3d 603 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).

Wade v. Tennessee Dep't of Fin. & Admin., 487 S.W.3d 123 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(5)(B) — 16 cases

Mitchell v. Madison Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 325 S.W.3d 603 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).

City of Memphis v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 239 S.W.3d 202 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).

Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Tennessee Dep't of Labor & Workforce Dev., Labor Standards Div., 402 S.W.3d 218 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(l) — 5 cases

Tennessee Cable Television Ass'n v. Tennessee Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 844 S.W.2d 151 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992).

Air Evac EMS, Inc. v. Robinson, 486 F. Supp. 2d 713 (M.D. Tenn. 2007).

Clear Channel Outdoors v. Tennessee Dep't of Transp., 337 S.W.3d 801 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).

Yokley v. State Bd. of Educ., 305 S.W.3d 523 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).

Miller v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of the Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 271 S.W.3d 659 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(i) — 9 cases

Garrett v. State, Dep't of Saf., 717 S.W.2d 290 (Tenn. 1986).

Daley v. Univ. of Tennessee at Memphis, 880 S.W.2d 693 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).

Bishop v. Tennessee State Bd. of Acct., 905 S.W.2d 939 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995).

Joshua Keller v. Janice Casteel (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).

Steven Yen v. Univ. of Tennessee Knoxville (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(j) — 4 cases

Dyanna Wilson v. City of Memphis (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).

Rosalyn Small v. Memphis-Shelby Cnty. Airport Auth. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).

Kent E. Barton, Jr. v. Candayce J. Keller (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).

Swift Roofing, Inc. v. State of Tennessee, Comm'r of Labor & Workforce Dev. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.