Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-104 (2026)

Petition

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1995, ch. 207, § 1; T.C.A. § 40-30-204.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 185 cases (32 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Swanson v. State, 749 S.W.2d 731 (Tenn. 1988).
Swanson v. State, 749 S.W.2d 731 (Tenn. 1988). · cites it 14× “When a petition does not conform to the requirements of T.C.A. § 40-30-104, “no petition for relief shall be dismissed for failure to follow the prescribed form or procedure until after the judge has given the petitioner reasonable opportunity, with the aid of counsel, to file…”
Cooper v. State, 847 S.W.2d 521 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). · cites it 4× “T.C.A. § 40-30-104(a)(10). If his allegations are only conclusory in nature or do not otherwise show a constitutional violation, the trial court is entitled to dismiss the particular claim without an evidentiary hearing.”
Terrance N. CARTER v. Rickey BELL, 279 S.W.3d 560 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 4× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a) (2006). Mr.”
Howell v. State, 151 S.W.3d 450 (Tenn. 2004). · cites it 4× “Under the Act, a prisoner may file a petition for post conviction relief with the clerk of the court where the conviction occurred, Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a) (2003), and "[r]elief shall be granted when the conviction or sentence is void or voidable because of the abridgment…”
Cauthern v. State, 145 S.W.3d 571 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(e) (2003). Furthermore, to the extent that the petitioner is attempting to assert an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, his cursory statement that counsel abandoned their duty to challenge the state’s case is wholly insufficient to merit…”
Sample v. State, 82 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. 2002). · cites it 4× “2d at 30 ; see also Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(b) (1990) ("The petition shall have attached affidavits, records or other evidence supporting its allegations .”
Sexton v. State, 151 S.W.3d 525 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “T.C.A. § 40-30-104(e). The petitioner relies upon dictum in Rogers Harris v.”
Holton v. State, 201 S.W.3d 626 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 7× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a) (2003). The petition must be filed “within one (1) year of the date of the final action of the highest state appellate court to which an appeal is takenId.”
Caruthers v. State, 814 S.W.2d 64 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a)(10); Gant v.”
Reid v. State, 197 S.W.3d 694 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 4× “The amendment was not verified by Reid but included the following statement of counsel: "Counsel have not requested that Petitioner sign this Amended Petition as required by Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(d) and Tenn. Sup.”
Jose Rodriguez a.k.a. Alex Lopez v. State of Tennessee, 437 S.W.3d 450 (Tenn. 2014). · cites it 4× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a). The petitioner is entitled to relief only when his “conviction or sentence is void or voidable because of the abridgment of any right guaranteed by the Constitution of Tennessee or the Constitution of the United States.”
Rigger v. State, 341 S.W.3d 299 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-104 provides: "Petitions challenging misdemeanor convictions not in a court of record shall be filed in a court of record having criminal jurisdiction in the county in which the conviction was obtained.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-104(10) — 2 cases
State v. Higgins, 729 S.W.2d 288 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987).
Proctor v. State, 868 S.W.2d 669 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a) — 20 cases
Terrance N. CARTER v. Rickey BELL, 279 S.W.3d 560 (Tenn. 2009). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a) (2006). Mr.”
Howell v. State, 151 S.W.3d 450 (Tenn. 2004). “Under the Act, a prisoner may file a petition for post conviction relief with the clerk of the court where the conviction occurred, Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a) (2003), and "[r]elief shall be granted when the conviction or sentence is void or voidable because of the abridgment…”
Jose Rodriguez a.k.a. Alex Lopez v. State of Tennessee, 437 S.W.3d 450 (Tenn. 2014). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a). The petitioner is entitled to relief only when his “conviction or sentence is void or voidable because of the abridgment of any right guaranteed by the Constitution of Tennessee or the Constitution of the United States.”
Rigger v. State, 341 S.W.3d 299 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-104 provides: "Petitions challenging misdemeanor convictions not in a court of record shall be filed in a court of record having criminal jurisdiction in the county in which the conviction was obtained.”
Tracy Rose Baker v. State of Tennessee, 417 S.W.3d 428 (Tenn. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a)(10) — 9 cases
Cooper v. State, 847 S.W.2d 521 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). “T.C.A. § 40-30-104(a)(10). If his allegations are only conclusory in nature or do not otherwise show a constitutional violation, the trial court is entitled to dismiss the particular claim without an evidentiary hearing.”
Caruthers v. State, 814 S.W.2d 64 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a)(10); Gant v.”
Coker v. State, 911 S.W.2d 357 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).
Swanson v. State, 749 S.W.2d 731 (Tenn. 1988). “When a petition does not conform to the requirements of T.C.A. § 40-30-104, “no petition for relief shall be dismissed for failure to follow the prescribed form or procedure until after the judge has given the petitioner reasonable opportunity, with the aid of counsel, to file…”
Albert v. State, 813 S.W.2d 426 (Tenn. 1991).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a)(6) — 1 case
Albert v. State, 813 S.W.2d 426 (Tenn. 1991).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a)(8) — 1 case
Swanson v. State, 749 S.W.2d 731 (Tenn. 1988). “When a petition does not conform to the requirements of T.C.A. § 40-30-104, “no petition for relief shall be dismissed for failure to follow the prescribed form or procedure until after the judge has given the petitioner reasonable opportunity, with the aid of counsel, to file…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-104(b) — 6 cases
Sample v. State, 82 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. 2002). “2d at 30 ; see also Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(b) (1990) ("The petition shall have attached affidavits, records or other evidence supporting its allegations .”
Christopher Lewis v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).
Crystal Lee Martin v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026).
John Willie Stone v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
Otha Bomar v. State (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-104(c) — 15 cases
Jose Rodriguez a.k.a. Alex Lopez v. State of Tennessee, 437 S.W.3d 450 (Tenn. 2014). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a). The petitioner is entitled to relief only when his “conviction or sentence is void or voidable because of the abridgment of any right guaranteed by the Constitution of Tennessee or the Constitution of the United States.”
Tracy Rose Baker v. State of Tennessee, 417 S.W.3d 428 (Tenn. 2013).
Tom Perry Bell v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013).
David Neal Davis v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2014).
Daetrus Pilate v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-104(d) — 38 cases
Reid v. State, 197 S.W.3d 694 (Tenn. 2006). “The amendment was not verified by Reid but included the following statement of counsel: "Counsel have not requested that Petitioner sign this Amended Petition as required by Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(d) and Tenn. Sup.”
Holton v. State, 201 S.W.3d 626 (Tenn. 2006). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a) (2003). The petition must be filed “within one (1) year of the date of the final action of the highest state appellate court to which an appeal is takenId.”
Roy E. Keough v. State of Tennessee, 356 S.W.3d 366 (Tenn. 2011).
Mark Lipton v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-104(e) — 35 cases
Cauthern v. State, 145 S.W.3d 571 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(e) (2003). Furthermore, to the extent that the petitioner is attempting to assert an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, his cursory statement that counsel abandoned their duty to challenge the state’s case is wholly insufficient to merit…”
Sexton v. State, 151 S.W.3d 525 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). “T.C.A. § 40-30-104(e). The petitioner relies upon dictum in Rogers Harris v.”
Holton v. State, 201 S.W.3d 626 (Tenn. 2006). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-104(a) (2003). The petition must be filed “within one (1) year of the date of the final action of the highest state appellate court to which an appeal is takenId.”
Cordarius Maxwell v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019).
Terrance Lawrence v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2023).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-104(g) — 3 cases
Tony Thomas v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).
Anthony H. Dean v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006).
Janalee Wilson v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.