Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-101 (2026)

Legislative intent - Application of parts 1-6

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 107, s 1, eff. 4/11/2019.

Acts 1972, ch. 839, § 1; 1978, ch. 574, § 1; T.C.A., § 49-2912; Acts 1994, ch. 768, § 2; 1995, ch. 542, § 1; 1998, ch. 832, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1984–2018 · leading case: P.G. v. Rutherford Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 313 F. Supp. 3d 891 (M.D. Tenn. 2018).
P.G. v. Rutherford Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 313 F. Supp. 3d 891 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). · cites it 2× “" *897 Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-101 (a)(1). Part of that scheme is the SEBSA.”
I.L. ex rel. Taylor v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 257 F. Supp. 3d 946 (E.D. Tenn. 2017). “§ 49-10-101(a)(1). Part of that scheme is the Special Education 'Behavioral Supports Act.”
Hicks v. Benton Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 222 F. Supp. 3d 613 (W.D. Tenn. 2016). “” She also refers to Tennessee Code Annotated §§ 49-10-101 through 1203, consisting of Parts 1 through 12 of the state’s special education legislation.”
Dickens Ex Rel. Dickens v. Johnson Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 661 F. Supp. 155 (E.D. Tenn. 1987). · cites it 2× “4 Plaintiff does not suggest that Ronnie has been declared emotionally or educationally handicapped pursuant to T.C.A. § 49-10-101, et seq. Nevertheless, even if Ronnie were handicapped, handicapped students are not immune from discipline.”
O'Toole Ex Rel. O'Toole v. Olathe Dist. Schs. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 223, 963 F. Supp. 1000 (D. Kan. 1997). · cites it 3× “2d 665 (1994), which held that Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-101(a)(1) 13 does not the raise IDEA’S standard, more persuasive.”
Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Wilson Cnty. Sch. Bd., 747 F. Supp. 436 (M.D. Tenn. 1990). · cites it 2× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-101(a)(l) (1972). The Act further defines a “free appropriate public education” to include “special education and related services which .”
Conklin v. Anne Arundel Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 946 F.2d 306 (4th Cir. 1991). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-101(a)(l) (1990). No court has yet addressed the question of whether this provision imposes on the State of Tennessee, via state law, any obligations other than those imposed by the EHA.”
Hill v. McNairy Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 229 F.R.D. 563 (W.D. Tenn. 2004). · cites it 2× “, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-101, et seq. The Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and monetary damages.”
Clevenger v. Oak Ridge Sch. Bd., 744 F.2d 514 (6th Cir. 1984). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-101 . Richard Clevenger is, by all accounts, a seriously emotionally disturbed nineteen-year-old and, as such, comes within the coverage of the Act.”
Joseph Rogers v. Memphis Schs. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 3× “§§ 1400-1491 (1994), as well as the special education laws in Tennessee, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 49-10-101 to 49-10-1203 (1996).”
Joseph Rogers v. Memphis Schs. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 3× “§§ 1400-1491 (1994), as well as the special education laws in Tennessee, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 49-10-101 to 49-10-1203 (1996).”
In the Matter of Wayne H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “and with regulations adopted by the Tennessee Board of Education pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 49-10-101(c)(1998) -9- to effect compliance with IDEA.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-101(a)(1) — 2 cases
I.L. ex rel. Taylor v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 257 F. Supp. 3d 946 (E.D. Tenn. 2017). “§ 49-10-101(a)(1). Part of that scheme is the Special Education 'Behavioral Supports Act.”
O'Toole Ex Rel. O'Toole v. Olathe Dist. Schs. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 223, 963 F. Supp. 1000 (D. Kan. 1997). “2d 665 (1994), which held that Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-101(a)(1) 13 does not the raise IDEA’S standard, more persuasive.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-101(a)(l) — 3 cases
Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Wilson Cnty. Sch. Bd., 747 F. Supp. 436 (M.D. Tenn. 1990). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-101(a)(l) (1972). The Act further defines a “free appropriate public education” to include “special education and related services which .”
O'Toole Ex Rel. O'Toole v. Olathe Dist. Schs. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 223, 963 F. Supp. 1000 (D. Kan. 1997). “2d 665 (1994), which held that Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-101(a)(1) 13 does not the raise IDEA’S standard, more persuasive.”
Conklin v. Anne Arundel Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 946 F.2d 306 (4th Cir. 1991). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-101(a)(l) (1990). No court has yet addressed the question of whether this provision imposes on the State of Tennessee, via state law, any obligations other than those imposed by the EHA.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-101(c)(1998) — 1 case
In the Matter of Wayne H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “and with regulations adopted by the Tennessee Board of Education pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 49-10-101(c)(1998) -9- to effect compliance with IDEA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.