Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-102 (2026)

Chapter definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter:

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 107,s 2, eff. 4/11/2019.

Acts 1972, ch. 839, § 3; 1978, ch. 573, § 1; 1981, ch. 151, § 1; 1981, ch. 281, § 1; T.C.A., § 49-2914; Acts 1988, ch. 677, § 1; 1989, ch. 421, § 1; 1994, ch. 768, § 2; 1998, ch. 832, § 2; 2010, ch. 734, § 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1990–2023 · leading case: F.H. Ex Rel. Hall v. Memphis City Schs., 764 F.3d 638 (6th Cir. 2014).
F.H. Ex Rel. Hall v. Memphis City Schs., 764 F.3d 638 (6th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-102 . Because F.H.”
P.G. v. Rutherford Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 313 F. Supp. 3d 891 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). “It is in place "to ensure that every student receiving special education services is free from the unreasonable, unsafe and unwarranted uses of isolation and restraint practices [and] encourage the use of positive behavioral interventions and support methods in schools." Tenn.…”
Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Wilson Cnty. Sch. Bd., 747 F. Supp. 436 (M.D. Tenn. 1990). · cites it 6× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-102(1) (1972). The Act is implemented through the “individualized education program” (IEP) which is mandated for each disabled child.”
Wilson Cnty. Sch. Sys. v. Clifton, 41 S.W.3d 645 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-102(1) (1990). 4 .”
L.H., a minor v. Tennessee Dep't of Educ. (M.D. Tenn. 2019). · cites it 2× “In order to qualify for the IEA program, a child must meet the following requirements: (A) Is a child with any of the following disabilities as defined by the state board of education pursuant to § 49-10-102: (i) Autism; (ii) Deaf-blindness; (iii) Hearing impairments; (iv)…”
M.G. v. Williamson Cty. Sch. (6th Cir. 2018). “See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 49-10-102 (1)(A) and (4)(C).”
O.B. v. Rutherford Cnty., Tennessee (M.D. Tenn. 2023). “The Tennessee Code states that “[a] student receiving special education services, as defined by § 49-10-102, may be restrained or isolated only in emergency situations.”
E.S. v. Clarksville Montgomery Cnty. Sch. Sys. (M.D. Tenn. 2023). “SEBSA also sets parameters for prohibited use of isolation or restraint in pertinent part as follows: (c) The use of any mechanical restraint on any student receiving special education services, as defined by § 49-10-102, is prohibited. (d) Any form of life-threatening…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-102(1) — 2 cases
Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Wilson Cnty. Sch. Bd., 747 F. Supp. 436 (M.D. Tenn. 1990). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-102(1) (1972). The Act is implemented through the “individualized education program” (IEP) which is mandated for each disabled child.”
Wilson Cnty. Sch. Sys. v. Clifton, 41 S.W.3d 645 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-102(1) (1990). 4 .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-102(4) — 1 case
Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Wilson Cnty. Sch. Bd., 747 F. Supp. 436 (M.D. Tenn. 1990). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-10-102(1) (1972). The Act is implemented through the “individualized education program” (IEP) which is mandated for each disabled child.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.