Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2007 (2026)

Tax imposed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 514, s 7, eff. 1/1/2016.

Acts 1999, ch. 406, § 3; 2000, ch. 982, §§ 15 - 17; 2002, ch. 856, § 3c; 2004, ch. 592, § 6; 2005, ch. 499, § 77; 2006, ch. 1019, § 32; 2007 , ch. 602, § 19; 2008 , ch. 1106, § 37; 2010 , ch. 1134, §§ 10, 11, 22.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2007–2020 · leading case: Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee, 486 S.W.3d 496 (Tenn. 2016).
Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee, 486 S.W.3d 496 (Tenn. 2016). · cites it 10× “‖ See Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2007 (excise tax); Tenn.”
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 67-4-2007 3 provides for the imposition of an excise tax: (a) All persons, except those having not-for-profit status, doing business in Tennessee shall, without exception other than as provided in this part, pay to the commissioner, annually, an excise tax, in addition to all…”
Emerachem Power, LLC v. David Gerregano (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 53× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2007 (d). 6 Under the federal “check-the-box” tax scheme, LLCs with 2 or more members (owners) are treated as partnerships by default.”
Vodafone Americas Holdings Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “The Tennessee Excise Tax and the Tennessee Franchise Tax are imposed on different tax bases; the excise tax is based on the taxpayer’s “net earnings,” see Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2007 , while the franchise tax is based on the taxpayer’s “net worth.”
J-Star Holdings, LLC v. The Pantry, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2007 (b). For all of these reasons, we conclude that the lease between J-Star and The Pantry 1 As J-Star points out, the excise tax is arguably a tax on “the act of entering into this Lease.”
Hilloak Realty Co. v. Chumley, 233 S.W.3d 816 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “See T.C.A. § 67-4-2007(a)(2006). Depreciation deductions taken by Hilloak after the effective date of the Act amounted to approximately $348,135.”
EMC Corp. v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Pub. Accounts of the State of Texas & Ken Paxton, Attorney Gen. of the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2015). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2007 (a). The question presented in this case is whether the Texas Franchise Tax is a tax "on or measured by income" that should receive similar treatment.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2007(a)(2006) — 1 case
Hilloak Realty Co. v. Chumley, 233 S.W.3d 816 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “See T.C.A. § 67-4-2007(a)(2006). Depreciation deductions taken by Hilloak after the effective date of the Act amounted to approximately $348,135.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2007(d) — 1 case
Emerachem Power, LLC v. David Gerregano (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2007 (d). 6 Under the federal “check-the-box” tax scheme, LLCs with 2 or more members (owners) are treated as partnerships by default.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.