Tenn. Code Ann. » Tenn. Code / Title 67 / Chapter 4 / Part 8
Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-806 (2026)

Duty of bail bondsman to collect tax - Disposition of collections

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It shall be the duty of the bail bondsman to collect the tax imposed by this part and to remit the tax to the department in such manner as the department may determine. A special account shall be created by the department into which all taxes collected under this part shall be deposited. All remitted revenues shall be maintained in such segregated account within the department until distributed or deposited, as required in this section, into the civil legal representation of indigents fund authorized and created by § 16-3-808. Such funds derived from the tax imposed and collected pursuant to this part shall be expended or distributed as follows:

Acts 2001, ch. 456, § 7.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1984–2014 · leading case: Federated Stores Realty, Inc. v. Huddleston, 852 S.W.2d 206 (Tenn. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Federated Stores Realty, Inc. v. Huddleston, 852 S.W.2d 206 (Tenn. 1992). · cites it 4× “" T.C.A. § 67-4-806, -903. The excise tax is levied at the rate of six percent of net earnings, T.”
Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A. v. Johnson, 26 S.W.3d 621 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 67-4-806(a). The parties concede that Wachovia is a unitary business as defined in T.”
First Am. Nat'l Bank of Knoxville v. Olsen, 751 S.W.2d 417 (Tenn. 1987). · cites it 3× “Plaintiff relies on the Federal statutory language, emphasizing that “[t]he exemption applies to each form of taxation that would require the obligation, the interest on the obligation, or both, to be considered in computing a tax, except — (1) a nondiscriminatory franchise tax…”
Tennessee Growers, Inc. v. King, 682 S.W.2d 203 (Tenn. 1984). · cites it 2× “§ 67-2702(a) [now T.C.A. § 67-4-806(a) ] requires corporations doing business in Tennessee to pay an excise tax “equal to six per cent (6%) of the net earnings for the next preceding fiscal year for business done in this state.”
J.C. Penney Nat'l Bank v. Johnson, 19 S.W.3d 831 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 67-4-804(a)(8) and was subject to franchise and excise taxation under T.C.A. §§ 67-4-806 and 67-4-903. In calculating the taxes, the Department of Revenue applied the single-factor, gross receipts apportionment formula applicable to financial institutions found in T.”
Newell Window Furnishing, Inc. v. Johnson, 311 S.W.3d 441 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “Each separate corporation doing business in Tennessee is responsible for payment of the state’s excise tax pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-806(a) (1994), which provides that “[a]ll corporations, .”
Tennessee Farmers Assurance Co. v. Loren L. Chumley, 197 S.W.3d 767 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 8× “The Tennessee excise tax, pursuant to T.C.A. § 67-4-806, 3 is accessed annually and is equal to six percent (6%) of the net earnings of a corporation.”
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Formerly § 67-4-806 etseq. (Repl. 1998). 4 . Formerly Tenn.”
Herschend v. Dir. of Revenue, 896 S.W.2d 458 (Mo. 1995). “Raymond and Kelly Herschend (the Herschends) seek a ruling that Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-806 (1994) 1 , a Tennessee corporate tax statute, is an “income tax” within the meaning of § 143.”
Vodafone Americas Holdings Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “2d at 421 (citing former statute Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-806 (b)). The need for the variance provision is also plain.”
Wachovia v. Johnson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 67-4-806(a). The parties concede the Wachovia is a unitary business as defined in T.”
L.M. Berry & Co. v. Huddleston (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 67-4-903(a), and imposed at the rate of $.25 per $100 of issued and outstanding stock, surplus and undivided profits.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-806(a) — 5 cases
Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A. v. Johnson, 26 S.W.3d 621 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “T.C.A. § 67-4-806(a). The parties concede that Wachovia is a unitary business as defined in T.”
Tennessee Growers, Inc. v. King, 682 S.W.2d 203 (Tenn. 1984). “§ 67-2702(a) [now T.C.A. § 67-4-806(a) ] requires corporations doing business in Tennessee to pay an excise tax “equal to six per cent (6%) of the net earnings for the next preceding fiscal year for business done in this state.”
Newell Window Furnishing, Inc. v. Johnson, 311 S.W.3d 441 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “Each separate corporation doing business in Tennessee is responsible for payment of the state’s excise tax pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-806(a) (1994), which provides that “[a]ll corporations, .”
Wachovia v. Johnson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “T.C.A. § 67-4-806(a). The parties concede the Wachovia is a unitary business as defined in T.”
L.M. Berry & Co. v. Huddleston (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “§ 67-4-903(a), and imposed at the rate of $.25 per $100 of issued and outstanding stock, surplus and undivided profits.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-806(b) — 1 case
First Am. Nat'l Bank of Knoxville v. Olsen, 751 S.W.2d 417 (Tenn. 1987). “Plaintiff relies on the Federal statutory language, emphasizing that “[t]he exemption applies to each form of taxation that would require the obligation, the interest on the obligation, or both, to be considered in computing a tax, except — (1) a nondiscriminatory franchise tax…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.