Ramirez v. State, 590 S.W.2d 509 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Ramirez v. State, 590 S.W.2d 509 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Arispe, Jr., Armando Villarrreal v. State (texapp, 2003-02-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Arispe, Jr., Armando Villarrreal v. State
Tex. App. · 2003 · confidence medium
Smith v. State , 590 S.W.2d 509, 513 (Tex. Crim.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Valdez v. State
Tex. App. · 1983 · confidence medium
Tex.Code Cr.P. art. 32A.02 (Supp.1982); Wooten v. State, 612 S.W.2d 561, 563 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); Velasquez v. State, 608 S.W.2d 674 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Flores v. State, 606 S.W.2d 859, 860 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Luna v. State, 602 S.W.2d 267 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Ramirez v. State, 590 S.W.2d 509, 510 (Tex.Cr.App.1979).
discussed Cited "see" Morgan v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ramirez v. State, 590 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.Cr.
cited Cited "see" Gillett v. State
Tex. App. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ramirez v. State, 590 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.Cr.App.1979).
cited Cited "see" Calais v. State
Tex. App. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ramirez v. State, 590 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.Cr.App.1979).
cited Cited "see" McManners v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See and cf. Ramirez v. State, 590 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Fleet v. State, 590 S,W.2d 714 (Tex.Cr.App.1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Velasquez v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ramirez v. State, 590 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.Cr.App.1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Morgan v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ramirez v. State, 590 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.Cr.App.1979).
Javier Rodolfo RAMIREZ, Appellant,
v.
the STATE of Texas, Appellee
62760.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec 12, 1979.
590 S.W.2d 509
Kitty Schild, El Paso, for appellant., Steve W. Simmons, Dist. Atty., and Lane C. Reedman, Asst. Dist. Atty., El Paso, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.
Onion, Douglas, Davis.
Cited by 30 opinions  |  Published

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for burglary. The court assessed punishment at five years, probated.

Ramirez was arrested on July 1,1977 for burglary. The case was originally set for trial on October 3, 1977, but there was no trial at that time. The State filed affidavits announcing ready on June 30, 1978 and on July 3, 1978. The provisions of the Texas Speedy Trial Act, Article 32A.02, V.A.C. C.P., became effective July 1, 1978. See Wade v. State, 572 S.W.2d 533 (Tex.Cr.App.[*510] 1978). On July 3, 1978, the State filed its announcement of ready. The trial was set again for January 9, 1979, at which time Ramirez filed a motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial claiming that 535 days had passed since his indictment. The motion was overruled and Ramirez then pled guilty.

Ramirez has waived his rights under the Act. Article 32A.02, Section 3, V.A.C.C.P., provides:

“The failure of a defendant to move for discharge under the provisions of this article prior to trial or the entry of a plea of guilty constitutes a waiver of the rights accorded by this article.” (Emphasis supplied)

Nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.