Johnson v. State, 786 S.W.2d 709 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Johnson v. State, 786 S.W.2d 709 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Myron Jamal Nash v. State (texapp, 2018-09-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
cited Cited "see" Myron Jamal Nash v. State
Tex. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Johnson v. State, 709 S.W.2d 345, 347 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1986), pet. dism’d on reh’g, 786 S.W.2d 709, 710 (Tex. Crim.
Robert Ralph JOHNSON
v.
The STATE of Texas
No. 0733-86.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jun 7, 1989.
786 S.W.2d 709
Benjamin F. Walker, San Antonio, for appellant., Michael R. Little, Dist. Atty., and Georgia L. Clapper, Asst. Dist. Atty., Anahuac, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

[*710] OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Our opinion on original submission is withdrawn.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated sexual assault. V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 22.021. His punishment was assessed by the jury at twenty years imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Johnson v. State, 709 S.W.2d 345 (Tex.App.—Houston (14th Dist.) 1986).

Pursuant to Rule 202(k), T.R.App.Proc. we dismiss appellant’s petition for discretionary review as having been improvidently granted. As is true in every case, refus-' al or dismissal of a petition for discretionary review by this Court does not constitute an endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the court of appeals. See Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983), Campbell v. State, 647 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.