Nargi v. State, 922 S.W.2d 180 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Nargi v. State, 922 S.W.2d 180 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Akins v. State (texapp, 2006-08-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Akins v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2006 · confidence medium
Morris, 195 S.W.3d at 745 ; Nargi v. State, 895 S.W.2d 820, 822 (Tex.App.Houston [14th DistJ 1995), pet. dism’d as improvidently granted, 922 S.W.2d 180, 181 (Tex.Crim.App.1996).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Shane Lee Hale v. State
Tex. App. · 2006 · confidence medium
Morris , 195 S.W.3d at 745 ; Nargi v. State , 895 S.W.2d 820, 822 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1995), pet. dism’d as improvidently granted , 922 S.W.2d 180, 181 (Tex. Crim.
cited Cited "see" Christopher H. Junco D/B/A AAA MAXX A/C & Heating v. Best Publications, L.L.P.
Tex. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nargi v. State , 895 S.W.2d 820, 822 (Tex.App.-Houston [14 th Dist.] 1995), pet. dism'd , improvidently granted , 922 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).
cited Cited "see" John Byron Simmons v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nargi v. State , 895 S.W.2d 820, 823 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] 1995), pet. dism'd , 922 S.W.2d 180 (Tex. Crim.
cited Cited "see" Darrell Wayne Morris v. State
Tex. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nargi v. State , 895 S.W.2d 820, 822 (Tex.App.-Houston [14 th Dist.] 1995), pet. dism'd , improvidently granted , 922 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).
cited Cited "see" Darrell Wayne Morris v. State
Tex. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nargi v. State , 895 S.W.2d 820, 822 (Tex.App.–Houston [14 th Dist.] 1995), pet. dism’d , improvidently granted , 922 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).
cited Cited "see" Darrell Wayne Morris v. State
Tex. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nargi v. State , 895 S.W.2d 820, 822 (Tex.App.-Houston [14 th Dist.] 1995), pet. dism'd , improvidently granted , 922 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).
cited Cited "see" Darrell Wayne Morris v. State
Tex. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nargi v. State, 895 S.W.2d 820, 822 (Tex.App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 1995), pet. dism’d, improvidently granted, 6 922 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).
cited Cited "see" Morris v. State
Tex. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nargi v. State, 895 S.W.2d 820, 822 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1995), pet. dism’d, improvidently granted, 922 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Crim.App.1996).
discussed Cited "see" Carter v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
Rhodes v. State, 945 S.W.2d 115, 118 (Tex.Crim.App.1997); accord Spight v. State, 76 S.W.3d 761, 769 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.); see Nargi v. State, 895 S.W.2d 820, 822 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1995), pet. dism’d, improvidently granted, 922 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). 6 .
Giovanni Antonio NARGI
v.
The STATE of Texas
No. 0548-95.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 15, 1996.
922 S.W.2d 180
R. Scott Shearer, Houston, for appellant., Rikke Burke Graber, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston and Robert A. Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.
McCormick, Baird, Clinton, Overstreet.
Cited by 24 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

[*181] OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of driving while intoxicated. The Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction. Nargi v. State, 895 S.W.2d 820 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1995). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to address the Court of Appeals’ holding that, under the facts of this case, an officer’s handcuffing of appellant “to gain control” during an investigatory stop did not elevate the detention to an arrest. See Nargi, 895 S.W.2d at 823.

We now find that our decision to grant appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvident. Tex.RApp.Pro. 202(k). Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

CLINTON, J., dissents.

Dissent

BAIRD, Judge,

dissenting on Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review.

Appellant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Nargi v. State, 895 S.W.2d 820 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1995). We granted review to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly classified appellant’s seizure as an investigatory stop rather than an arrest.

For the reasons stated in Francis v. State, 922 S.W.2d 176 (Tex.Cr.App. No. 628-95, delivered this day) (Baird, J., concurring and dissenting), I believe this case should be remanded to the Court of Appeals to determine whether, given the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person in appellant’s position would believe his/her seizure was to be brief. Id., 922 S.W.2d at 179. Consequently, I dissent to the dismissal of appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

OVERSTREET, J., joins this opinion.