Sec. 11.002. RESPONSIBILITY OF SCHOOL DISTRICTS FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION. The school districts and charter schools created in accordance with the laws of this state have the primary responsibility for implementing the state's system of public education and ensuring student performance in accordance with this code.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995.
Neeley v. West Orange-Cove Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 176 S.W.3d 746 (Tex. 2005). · cites it 4ד[153] TEX. EDUC. CODE § 11.002; see also § 11.151 (stating powers of the trustees of an independent school district, among other things, to sue and be sued).”
Clint Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Sonia Herrera Marquez, 487 S.W.3d 538 (Tex. 2016). “ensuring student performance in accordance with this code,” Tex. Educ. . Code § 11.002;. — requires district boards to establish academic and fiscal performance goals and ensure that the superintendent is accountable for meeting those goals, id.”
United States v. Texas, 601 F.3d 354 (5th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2ד” Tex. Educ. Code § 11.002. And, “[a]n educational function not specifically delegated to [TEA] is reserved to and shall be performed by school districts or open-enrollment charter schools.”
Michael McIntyre v. El Paso Indep. Sch. Dist., 499 S.W.3d 820 (Tex. 2016). “Tex. Educ. Code §§ 11.002, 25.085(a). The McIntyres claim that, under Leeper’s interpretation of Education Code provisions, they are exempt from section 25.”
United States v. Texas, 572 F. Supp. 2d 726 (E.D. Tex. 2008). “” Tex. Educ.Code § 11.002 (Vernon 2008). Texas law enumerates TEA and the state board of education’s powers and reserves all other functions for the school districts: “[a]n educational function not specifically delegated to the agency or the board under this code is reserved to…”
United States v. State of Texas, No. 08-40858 (5th Cir. Apr. 12, 2010). · cites it 2ד” TEX. EDUC. CODE § 11.002. And, “[a]n educational function not specifically delegated to [TEA] is reserved to and shall be performed by school districts or open-enrollment charter schools.”
Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Joseph Palazzolo, No. 02-18-00205-CV (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 13, 2019). “003 (“An educational function not specifically delegated to the agency or the [TEA] board under this code is reserved to and shall be performed by school districts or open- 19 enrollment charter schools.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.