Texas Codes

Tex. Transp. Code § 724.016 (2026)

Breath Specimen

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 724.016. BREATH SPECIMEN. (a) A breath specimen taken at the request or order of a peace officer must be taken and analyzed under rules of the department by an individual possessing a certificate issued by the department certifying that the individual is qualified to perform the analysis.

(b) The department may:

(1) adopt rules approving satisfactory analytical methods; and

(2) ascertain the qualifications of an individual to perform the analysis.

(c) The department may revoke a certificate for cause.

Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2024 · leading case: State v. Robinson, 334 S.W.3d 776 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011).
State v. Robinson, 334 S.W.3d 776 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “1995) (scientific reliability of intoxilyzer test is established so long as the proponent of evidence of the test results shows that the provisions of predecessor to TEX. TRANSP. CODE § 724.016 were satisfied).”
Shpikula v. State, 68 S.W.3d 212 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002). · cites it 2× “Tex. TRANSp. Code AnN. § 724.016 (Vernon 1999).”
Karl Frederick Schultz v. State, 457 S.W.3d 94 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.016 (a) (Vernon 2011).”
Scillitani v. State, 343 S.W.3d 914 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011). · cites it 2× “” Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.016 (b)(1) (West 2011).”
Reynolds v. State, 204 S.W.3d 386 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). “See Tex. Transp. Code § 724.016(a) ("A breath specimen taken at the request or order of a peace officer must be taken and analyzed under rules of the [DPS] by an individual possessing a certificate issued by the department certifying that the individual is qualified to perform…”
Scherl v. State, 7 S.W.3d 650 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1999). “1993) (current version at Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.016 (a) (Vernon 1999)).”
Elio Raul Trigo v. State, 485 S.W.3d 603 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2016). “3d at 390 ; Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.016 (a) (West 2011)).”
Andrew J. Serrano v. State, 464 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2015). “” Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.016 (West 2011).”
Adams v. State, 67 S.W.3d 450 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002). “Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.016 (Vernon 1999); Atkinson, 923 S.”
Davis v. State, 949 S.W.2d 28 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997). “Laws 1025 , 1822 (current version Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.016 (Vernon 1997)); see also Atkinson, 923 S.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Kusenberger, 29 S.W.3d 154 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2000). “See Tex. Trans. Code Ann. § 724.016 (breath); id.”
Solomon Getachew Worku v. State, No. 14-13-00047-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 3, 2014). · cites it 2× “Appellant argues this is conclusive proof that he was not observed for 15 minutes prior to taking the breath test.”
Tex. Transp. Code § 724.016(a): 3 cases
Reynolds v. State, 204 S.W.3d 386 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). “See Tex. Transp. Code § 724.016(a) ("A breath specimen taken at the request or order of a peace officer must be taken and analyzed under rules of the [DPS] by an individual possessing a certificate issued by the department certifying that the individual is qualified to perform…”
Karl Frederick Schultz v. State, 457 S.W.3d 94 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014). “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.016 (a) (Vernon 2011).”
Reynolds II, Jerry Glenn, No. PD-1086-05 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 18, 2006).
Tex. Transp. Code § 724.016(b)(1): 3 cases
Scillitani v. State, 343 S.W.3d 914 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011). “” Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.016 (b)(1) (West 2011).”
Karl Frederick Schultz v. State, No. 01-13-00505-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 20, 2014).
State v. Arturo Gonzalez, No. 08-12-00311-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Oct. 8, 2014).
Tex. Transp. Code § 724.016(b)(2): 1 case
State v. Arturo Gonzalez, No. 08-12-00311-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Oct. 8, 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.