10 U.S.C. § 12

REQUIRED REPORTING OF DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

“(a)Reporting by Insurers.—Beginning 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Sept. 29, 2006], no insurer may enter into or renew a contractual relationship with any other person that sells or solicits the sale of any life insurance product on any military installation of the United States, unless the insurer has implemented a system to report to the State insurance commissioner of the State of domicile of the insurer and the State of residence of that other person—“(1) any disciplinary action taken by any Federal or State government entity with respect to sales or solicitations of life insurance products on a military installation that the insurer knows, or in the exercise of due diligence should have known, to have been taken; and“(2) any significant disciplinary action taken by the insurer with respect to sales or solicitations of life insurance products on a military installation of the United States.“(b)Reporting by States.—It is the sense of Congress that, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the States should collectively implement a system to—“(1) receive reports of disciplinary actions taken against persons that sell or solicit the sale of any life insurance product on any military installation of the United States by insurers or Federal or State government entities with respect to such sales or solicitations; and“(2) disseminate such information to all other States and to the Secretary of Defense.“(c)Definition.—As used in this section, the term ‘insurer’ means a person engaged in the business of insurance.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2004–2016 · leading case: Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 840 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 840 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 2016). “10 U.S.C. § 12 . Because Move’s motion to vacate was filed over four years after the three month statutory window closed, we must first determine whether the doctrine of equitable tolling applies to the FAA, such that the motion is not time-barred.”

Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 360 F.3d 195 (D.C. Cir. 2004). “See 10 U.S.C. § 12 ,301 (2000). During periods of full-time National Guard duty, civilian technicians receive military pay and benefits.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.