U.S. Code » Title 10 » Subtitle Subtitle A— General Military Law › Part PART IV— SERVICE, SUPPLY, AND PROPERTY › Chapter CHAPTER 159— REAL PROPERTY; RELATED PERSONAL PROPERTY; AND LEASE OF NON-EXCESS PROPERTY

10 U.S.C. § 2909

RESTRICTION ON OTHER BASE CLOSURE AUTHORITY

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)In General.—Except as provided in subsection (c), during the period beginning on November 5, 1990, and ending on April 15, 2006, this part shall be the exclusive authority for selecting for closure or realignment, or for carrying out any closure or realignment of, a military installation inside the United States.“(b)Restriction.—Except as provided in subsection (c), none of the funds available to the Department of Defense may be used, other than under this part, during the period specified in subsection (a)—“(1) to identify, through any transmittal to the Congress or through any other public announcement or notification, any military installation inside the United States as an installation to be closed or realigned or as an installation under consideration for closure or realignment; or“(2) to carry out any closure or realignment of a military installation inside the United States.“(c)Exception.—Nothing in this part affects the authority of the Secretary to carry out—“(1) closures and realignments under title II of Public Law 100–526 [set out below]; and“(2) closures and realignments to which section 2687 of title 10, United States Code, is not applicable, including closures and realignments carried out for reasons of national security or a military emergency referred to in subsection (c) of such section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2005–2005 · leading case: Corzine v. 2005 Def. Base Closure & Realignment Comm'n, 388 F. Supp. 2d 446 (D.N.J. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Corzine v. 2005 Def. Base Closure & Realignment Comm'n, 388 F. Supp. 2d 446 (D.N.J. 2005). “10 U.S.C. § 2909 . Further, such review is only available if initiated within a certain time period.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.