10 U.S.C. § 676
Renumbered § 12308]
[renumbered]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1961–1968 · leading case: Charles H. Grahl v. The United States, 336 F.2d 199 (Ct. Cl. 1964).
Charles H. Grahl v. The United States, 336 F.2d 199 (Ct. Cl. 1964). “The opinion went on to state that since plaintiff, when he returned to duty in 1955, was not retained on active service within the meaning of 10 U.S.C. § 676 , his active duty during that period of service could not be credited for the purpose of increasing his retired pay under…”
Carver v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 67 (Ct. Cl. 1962). “Section 302(e) of the Act of June 29,1948, now codified in 10 U.S.C. § 676 , under which plaintiff is seeking credit for service subsequent to date of qualification for retirement, provides: § 676.”
Leslie D. Jamerson v. The United States, 401 F.2d 808 (Ct. Cl. 1968). “There is no indication in the parties' briefs by what statutory authority plaintiff was retained except that it was the policy of the Secretary of the Air Force to retain on active duty officers who had to be transferred to the Retired Reserve until they were eligible for…”
Belle C. Watman, as of the Last Will & Testament of Morris Watman v. United States, 288 F.2d 472 (Ct. Cl. 1961). “Now 10 U.S.C.A. §§ 676 , 1331, 1332. Now 10 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.