10 U.S.C. § 9532
Factories, arsenals, and depots: manufacture at
The Secretary of the Air Force may have supplies needed for the Department of the Air Force made in factories, arsenals, or depots owned by the United States, so far as those factories, arsenals, or depots can make those supplies on an economical basis.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2000–2001 · leading case: Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 2119 v. Rumsfeld, 262 F.3d 649 (7th Cir. 2001).
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 2119 v. Rumsfeld, 262 F.3d 649 (7th Cir. 2001). “As the district court noted, although the Arsenal Act applies to the Army, the Air Force is governed by a similar statute, 10 U.S.C. § 9532 , that largely parallels the Arsenal Act’s provisions.”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 2119 v. Cohen, 110 F. Supp. 2d 752 (C.D. Ill. 2000). “10 U.S.C. § 9532 (emphasis added). Although § 9532 originally had the same mandatory “shall” language as the Army Arsenal Act, the Air Force statute was subsequently amended to change the word “shall” to “may” in 1951, after the Secretary of the Air Force successfully persuaded…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.