Notes of Decisions
AFI Holding, Inc. v. Brown, 530 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2008).
· cites it 2× “Dye appeals from a decision of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) for the Ninth Circuit affirming the order of the bankruptcy judge removing her as Trustee for cause pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 324 in this Chapter 7 proceeding.”
Yosef A. Maiman & Merhav (M.N.F.) Ltd. v. Spizz (In re Ampal-Am. Israel Corp.), 554 B.R. 604 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016).
· cites it 2× “While Appellants press that the Trustee’s joining TKD violates the letter of the Discovery Order, the Court concurs with the Bankruptcy Court that there is no danger of disclosure of this sensitive information to Shapira — particularly given that TKD’s relationship with Shapira…”
Reed v. Cooper (In Re Cooper), 405 B.R. 801 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2009).
· cites it 2× “11 U.S.C. § 324 . But, it would seem to be, generally, an unwise idea to allow a creditor to usurp the trustee’s role as a representative of the estate ( 11 U.”
Ritchie Special Credit Investments, Ltd. v. United States Tr., 620 F.3d 847 (8th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 2× “Although Ritchie can seek Kelley’s removal for cause under 11 U.S.C. § 324 , Ritchie would be unable to obtain the relief it seeks' — ’the appointment of PGW’s own trustee at the outset of the bankruptcy proceedings — in the absence of our immediate review.”
In Re Dinubilo, 177 B.R. 932 (E.D. Cal. 1993).
· cites it 3× “On February 14, 1991, OUST filed a motion to remove the Case Trustee under 11 U.S.C. § 324 (a) 2 for alleged nonperformance of his duties by failure to expeditiously pursue the debtor’s improper transfers of real property; failure to investigate the presence of equity in real…”
United States Tr. v. Repp (In Re Sheehan), 185 B.R. 819 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1995).
· cites it 4× “Trustee is seeking to have Repp removed as Trustee in this case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 324 (a). In the event Repp is removed as Trustee under that section, it will have the effect of removing her as Trustee in all cases which she is still serving as the Chapter 7 Trustee.”
In re BH & P Inc., 949 F.2d 1300 (3d Cir. 1991).
· cites it 4× “§ 701 (a)(1) and was, therefore, removable for “cause” pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 324 . The court held that RGZ and the other professionals assisting Maggio should also be disqualified in the Herman and Berkow cases, reasoning that these professionals also failed to qualify as…”
11 U.S.C. § 324(a): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.