12 U.S.C. § 1701
Short title
This chapter may be cited as the “National Housing Act.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 374
cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1938–2026 · leading case: United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839 (1996).
United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839 (1996). “1246 (1934) (codified, as amended, at 12 U. S. C. §§ 1701 -1750g (1988 ed.)). *845 The resulting regulatory regime worked reasonably well until the combination of high interest rates and inflation in the late 1970's and early 1980's brought about a second crisis in the thrift…”
Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 211 Cal. App. 4th 1250 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012). “Congress created the FHA through the National Housing Act (NHA; 12 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq.). (See Nehemiah Corp.”
United States v. Southland Mgmt. Corp., 326 F.3d 669 (5th Cir. 2002). “1246 (1934) (codified as amended at 12 U.S.C. §§ 1701 -1750g (2001)) (the “NHA”), Congress sought to increase the supply of low-income housing by creating a program that provides mortgage credit to the private sector.”
O'CONNOR v. Vill. Green Owners Assn., 662 P.2d 427 (Cal. 1983). “Second, an association of homeowners whether their homes are separate premises, or part of one structure as in a condominium apartment cannot by any stretch of judicial imagination be held to be a business.”
Glendale Fed. Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States, 239 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “1246 (1934) (codified as amended at 12 U.S.C. §§ 1701 -1750g (1988)). 3 . Ch.”
Patricia D. Deubert & Sonya M. Deroche v. Gulf Fed. Sav. Bank, 820 F.2d 754 (5th Cir. 1987). “§ 1985 (2) and (3); the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq.) and the federal constitution.”
Leo Burroughs, Jr., Cross-Appellees v. Carla Hills, Sec'y, Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., Cross-Appellants, 741 F.2d 1525 (7th Cir. 1984). “Plaintiffs admit that the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1701 and ff is the authority under which the United States insured and then foreclosed the mortgage on the involved property, becoming owner of record, and under which the Federal defendants acted.”
Feemster v. BSA Ltd. P'ship, 471 F. Supp. 2d 87 (D.D.C. 2007). “§ 1437f (1997) *88 (“MAHRAA”); the National Housing Act (“NHA”), 12 U.S.C. § 1701 , et seq. (2004); the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.”
United States v. McNinch, 356 U.S. 595 (1958). “1246 , as amended, 12 U. S. C. § 1701 et seq.; 24 CFR §§ 200.”
Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc. v. Neal, 922 A.2d 538 (Md. 2007). “12 U.S.C. §§ 1701 et seq. (2000). 2 . The couple is now divorced.”
Fleet Real Est. Funding Corp. v. Smith, 530 A.2d 919 (Pa. 1987). “The mortgage is insured against default by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) under Subchapter II of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. In conjunction with the mortgage transaction, appellant received a disclosure statement mandated by the Truth in Lending…”
Fandel v. Allen, 937 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “Similarly, regulations adopted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) pursuant to the National Housing Act ( 12 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. (2006)) may be raised as an affirmative defense in foreclosure actions even though the regulations do not create a private…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1701(d)(8) — 1 case
Montgomery v. U.S. Bank N.A. (D. Neb. 2025).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1701(k) — 2 cases
United States v. Robidoux (M.D. Penn. 2021).
United States v. Coy (M.D. Penn. 2021).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.