12 U.S.C. § 62

List of shareholders

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar

The president and cashier of every national banking association shall cause to be kept at all times a full and correct list of the names and residences of all the shareholders in the association, and the number of shares held by each, in the office where its business is transacted. Such list shall be subject to the inspection of all the shareholders and creditors of the association, and the officers authorized to assess taxes under State authority, during business hours of each day in which business may be legally transacted. A copy of such list, verified by the oath of such president or cashier, shall be transmitted to the Comptroller of the Currency within ten days of any demand therefor made by him.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1934–2009 · leading case: Cuomo v. Clearing House Ass'n, LLC
Cuomo v. Clearing House Ass'n, LLC (2009) scotus · cites it 2× “Similarly, 12 U.S.C. § 62 permits state tax officials to inspect national bank shareholder lists.”
Barbour v. Thomas (1936) ca6 “12, § 62 [ 12 U.S.C.A. § 62 ]) but the court did not hold that an assessment under the federal statute was not enforceable against its stockholders as the real or actual owners of the banks’ stock.”
Laurent v. Anderson (1934) ca6 “Presumably, such certification was to be made in compliance with title 12 USCA § 62, which provides that national banking associations shall at all times beep a full and correct list of the names and addresses of all shareholders and the number of shares held by each, and that…”
Todd v. Russell (1939) ca2 “The provisions of 12 U.S.C.A. § 62 , which require the keeping, subject to inspection by shareholders and creditors, of a full and accurate list, in the office where its business is transacted, of the names and residences of all the shareholders in a national banking…”
Wolpert v. First National Bank of East Islip (1974) nyed “12 U.S.C. § 62 . Finally, the Bank notes Hariton’s failure to indicate the expected vote of shares for each nominee.”
Benedict v. Anderson (1934) ca6 “(12 USCA § 62). He never undertook in an action against the bank or the comptroller to rescind the issuance to him of any of the dividend stock.”
Rawlings v. Commercial National Bank (1942) lawd “As part of this arrangement, the note in question was executed and transferred to the new bank along with all other assets, except the right to assess stockholders of the old bank for the benefit of creditors under the National Bank Law, 12 U.S.C.A. §§ 62 , 63. In consideration…”
Reuter v. McCook (1937) ca9 · cites it 2× “12 U.S.C.A. § 62 . One who knowingly allows the bank’s records to show him as a shareholder becomes es-topped to deny that he is such, though he be in fact an agent, trustee, pledgee, or dummy.”
Schlener v. Davis (1935) ca5 “12 USCA § 62. One who knowingly allows the bank’s records to show him as a shareholder becomes estopped to deny that he is such, though he be in fact an agent, trustee, pledgee, or dummy.”
Jolly v. Marion National Bank (1976) sc “§ 62 , the president and cashier of every national bank are required to keep at all times, in the office where the business of the bank is transacted, a full- and correct list of the names and residences of all the shareholders, and the number of shares held by each, which shall…”
Nettles v. Tillson (1937) ca5 “Accepting that statement, though it is not evidence, it would be easily possible and is necessary to show the terms of the conversion and whether there was any obligation on the deceased to take the stock or a mere eagerness of the reorganizers to have her do so.”
Conyers v. Cleveland (1937) ca4 “held by a holding company and the failure of the defendants to deny to the bank examiner the erroneous statement contained in his report were matters to be considered in support of plaintiff’s case and in contradiction and impeachment of the position and testimony of defendants;…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.