17 U.S.C. § 601

Repealed. Pub. L. 111–295, § 4(a), Dec. 9, 2010, 124 Stat. 3180]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 17 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1981–2016 · leading case: Cooling Sys. & Flexibles, Inc., a California Corp., Plaintiff v. Stuart Radiator, Inc., Stuart-W., Inc., 777 F.2d 485 (9th Cir. 1985).
Cooling Sys. & Flexibles, Inc., a California Corp., Plaintiff v. Stuart Radiator, Inc., Stuart-W., Inc., 777 F.2d 485 (9th Cir. 1985). · cites it 4× “It alleges that the district court erred in several respects: (1) by holding that a typographical error in its copyright registration certificate prevented its radiator catalog from receiving a valid registration; (2) by holding that the Manufacturing Clause, 17 U.S.C. § 601…”
Bv Eng'g v. Univ. of California, Los Angeles, 858 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir. 1988). · cites it 2× “Section 601(b)(3) *1399 provided an exemption “where importation is sought under the authority of or for the use, other than in schools, of .”
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng, 654 F.3d 210 (2d Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “17 U.S.C. § 601 (a)(1) (emphasis added). Also, as the majority points out, § 104(b)(2) provides "[t]he works specified by sections 102 and 103, when published, are subject to protection under this title if the work is first published in the United States or in a foreign nation .”
Authors League of Am., Inc. v. Oman, 790 F.2d 220 (2d Cir. 1986). · cites it 10× “PRATT, Circuit Judge: The sole issue raised on this appeal is the constitutionality of the manufacturing clause of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 601 (1985), a provision that restricts importation of copyrighted, foreign-manufactured, nondramatic, literary works.”
Authors League of Am., Inc. v. Ass'n of Am. Publishers, 619 F. Supp. 798 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). · cites it 5× “17 U.S.C. § 601 (1982). This section applies only to nondramatic work that is written mainly in the English language.”
T.B. Harms Co. v. Jem Records, Inc., 655 F. Supp. 1575 (D.N.J. 1987). “In a case where the copies or phonorecords were lawfully made, the United States Customs Service has no authority to prevent their importation unless the provisions of section 601 [ 17 U.S.C. § 601 ] are applicable. In either case, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to…”
Pearson Educ., Inc. v. Liu, 656 F. Supp. 2d 407 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). “17 U.S.C. § 601 (a) (emphasis added). Section 1001, added by the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992, Pub.”
Richard Anderson Photography v. Brown, 852 F.2d 114 (4th Cir. 1988). · cites it 3× “See 17 U.S.C. § 601 (a). Section 601 was tied to § 501 in that a plaintiff's illegal importation under § 601 was a complete defense to plaintiffs suit for infringement “with respect to all of the nondramatic literary material comprised in the work.”
United States v. Moghadam, 175 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 1999). “There, the issue was the constitutionality of 17 U.S.C. § 601 , a now-expired provision designed to protect the domestic book publishing and printing industries by restricting the importation of copyrighted, nondramatic literary works which were published abroad.”
Golaschevsky v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Env't Resources, 683 A.2d 1299 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1996). “” 17 U.S.C. § 601 (a). However, when an employee reports a violation of a federal law by the Commonwealth to his employer, this report is not necessarily protected activity.”
Sebastian Int'l, Inc. v. Consum. Contact (PTY) Ltd., 664 F. Supp. 909 (D.N.J. 1987). “" The only connection between place of manufacture and copyright protection, however, is the manufacturing clause codified at 17 U.S.C. § 601 (Supp. 1987). Under this clause, certain printed material must be manufactured in the United States to qualify for copyright protection.”
Photographic Illustrators Corp. v. Orgill, Inc., 316 F.R.D. 45 (D. Mass. 2016). “In April 2014, PIC filed suit against Orgill alleging copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 601 (Count I); mishandling of copyright management information under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 17 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.