18 U.S.C. § 1074
Flight to avoid prosecution for damaging or destroying any building or other real or personal property
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted “fined under this title” for “fined not more than $5,000”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1990–2002 · leading case: United States v. Bowens
United States v. Bowens (2000)
“§ 1073 (designating venue in prosecutions for flight to avoid prosecution or giving testimony); 18 U.S.C. § 1074 (b) (same); 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (h) (designating venue in prosecutions for obstruction of justice and witness or juror tampering).”
United States v. Rafael Sanchez and Luis Sanchez (1993)
“§ 844 (d)); and flight to avoid prosecution ( 18 U.S.C. § 1074 ). Rafael Sanchez was additionally charged with interstate transport of explosives by a person charged with a criminal offense ( 18 U.”
United States v. Peter Noone (1991)
“by explosive_ 18 U.S.C. § 1074 (emphasis added). 735 F.”
United States v. Tarrant (1990)
“¶ 11); (6) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1074 , unlawful flight to avoid prosecution, for leaving Texas; in the factual resume accompanying his plea of guilty, which plea Defendant made before this very Court, Defendant specifically admitted leaving Texas to avoid…”
United States v. Jay Scott Ballinger (2002)
“§ 1073 (to avoid prosecution); 18 U.S.C. § 1074 (to avoid prosecution for destroying property); 18 U.”
United States v. Noone (1990)
“Motion to Dismiss Defendant Peter Noone moves to dismiss the indictment against him on two separate grounds: (1) that the statute under which he is charged, 18 U.S.C. § 1074 , applies only to flight from state, and not federal, prosecutions; 1 and (2) that the government failed…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.