18 U.S.C. § 151
Definition
As used in this chapter, the term “debtor” means a debtor concerning whom a petition has been filed under title 11.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1950–2024 · leading case: United States v. Darin McAllister
United States v. Darin McAllister (2012)
“§ 1344 ; and three counts of bankruptcy fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 151 (3). During voir dire, the Government used peremptory challenges to strike the only two African- American prospective jurors—Jurors Willie Ewing and Jaminthia Pillow.”
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shearn MOODY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant (1991)
“The statutes concerning crimes relating to bankruptcy, 18 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., were amended to conform to the new Code, Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 § 314, Pub.”
In Re KTMA Acquisition Corp. (1993)
“§ 101 (4) and that he has a “first priority claim on the assets of the Debtor”; that a constructive trust should be imposed; that the trustee has possibly violated 47 CFR § 73.”
In Re Rose (2004)
“See generally, 18 U.S.C.A. § 151 through 157 (West 2000).”
New World Marketing Corp. v. Garcia (In Re Garcia) (1988)
“First of all, the purpose of the statement is to indicate that although the language of section 727(a)(4) incorporates certain bankruptcy crimes (found at 18 U.S.C. § 151 et seq), it would not be necessary to present proof by the traditional criminal standard — beyond a…”
In Re Thomas (2006)
“18 USC § 3057 requires any judge who has “reasonable grounds for believing that any violation under chapter 9 of this title [ 18 USC §§ 151 et seq] ...” to report the details to the appropriate United States Attorney.”
United States v. Sanders (1998)
“§ 922 (j) (Count III), and retaliating against a witness in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 151 (count IV). Sanders entered a plea of guilty to Counts I and III on April 29, 1996; Counts II and IV were dismissed on motion of the government.”
In Re Koliba (2006)
“” 18 U.S.C. § 151 . Thus, carrying the UST’s position to its logical conclusion,—that an unverified petition is not a legally effective petition, thereby depriving a court of jurisdiction—a person who never signs their petition could viably argue that they are not a debtor for…”
In Re Valparaiso Motel Corp. (1990)
“§ 3057 as to the possibility that a false oath was made by Michael Cooper pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 151 . The Clerk shall enter this order on a separate document pursuant to Bankr.”
In Re Cordova Gonzalez (1989)
“Neither does the Court expresses an opinion on whether debtors’ action may constitute a violation to 18 U.S.C. §§ 151 ,152. The U.S. Attorney and the U.”
In Re Bost (2006)
“Angeleri should not be suspended from practicing law in the Arkansas Bankruptcy Courts in accordance with Local Rule 2090-2 until the Committee on Professional Conduct reaches a decision on this Complaint; and it is further FURTHER ORDERED that this Opinion will be forwarded to…”
Owen P. Barnes, Jr. v. United States (1955)
“18 U.S.C.A. §§ 151 and 152, formerly 11 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.