18 U.S.C. § 1658
Plunder of distressed vessel
Whoever holds out or shows any false light, or extinguishes any true light, with intent to bring any vessel sailing upon the sea into danger or distress or shipwreck—
Shall be imprisoned not less than ten years and may be imprisoned for life.
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 488 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, § 297, 35 Stat. 1146).
Mandatory punishment provision in subsection (a) was rephrased in the alternative.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted “fined under this title” for “fined not more than $5,000”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1970–2024 · leading case: United States v. Polizzi
United States v. Polizzi (2008)
“§ 1655 Piracy in the form of assault on a commander Life 18 U.S.C. § 1658 (b) Preventing escape from a sinking vessel OR holding out a 10 years false light, or extinguishing a true light with intent to cause distress to a sailing vessel 18 U.”
United States v. Terry Wayne Denson, Stephen Orlando and Joseph James Janish, Defendants- in Re United States of America (1979)
“§ 1201 (kidnaping); 18 U.S.C.A. § 1658 (plunder of distressed vessel); 18 U.”
Ionian Shipping Co. v. British Law Insurance Co. (1970)
“For example, it is suggested that those questions dealing with the witness’s employment as Master of the “SOPHIA M” and his actions in connection with the loss of the vessel, if answered in the affirmative, would spell out the statutory crime of Plunder of a Distressed Vessel,…”
W. v. Yale University (2024)
“However, as Plaintiff pointed out in her opposition, and Defendants conceded in their reply, the statute of limitations for claims under § 1981 is four years, set by 18 U.S.C. § 1658 . Pl.’s Opp’n at 8; Defs.”
(PS) Rile v. Land Home Financial Services Inc (2024)
“It is certainly true that Plaintiff’s allegations are 24 too conclusory to plausibly show that the moving Defendants committed fraud or otherwise 25 26 1 Plaintiff does not explain what he means by “piracy” in this part of the TAC, though he elsewhere refers to the federal…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.