18 U.S.C. § 18
Organization defined
As used in this title, the term “organization” means a person other than an individual.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: United States v. Ng Lap Seng
United States v. Ng Lap Seng (2019)
“§ 1 and 18 U.S.C. § 18 . And there is no need to exclude such persons from the word “organization” as used in § 666 to avoid rendering other language in the statute superfluous.”
United States v. Salvador Vargas Navarro Samuel Pasqual Edmondson (1999)
“A defendant need not be present: (1) when represented by counsel and the defendant is an organization, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 18 ; (2) when the offense is punishable by fine or by imprisonment for not more than one year or both, and the court, with the written consent of the…”
United States v. Torres-Palma (2002)
“A defendant need not be present: (1) when represented by counsel and the defendant is an organization, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 18 ; (2) when the offense is punishable by fine or by imprisonment for not more than one year or both, and the court, with the written consent of the…”
Manuel Federico Samaniego-Meraz v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1995)
“§ 841 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 18 . Consequently, an Order to Show Cause was issued on February 14, 1992, charging him as deportable under INA §§ 241(a)(1)(B) [entry without inspection], 241(a)(1)(A) [no valid immigration visa], and 241(a)(2)(B)(i) [conviction of a controlled…”
State v. Meade (1997)
“A defendant need not be present: “(1) when represented by counsel and the defendant is an organization, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 18 ; “(2) when the offense is punishable by fine or by imprisonment for not more than one year or both, and the court, with the written consent of…”
United States v. Al-Arian (2003)
“See 18 U.S.C. § 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a); this offense is punishable by up to twenty-five years imprisonment.”
United States v. Barraza (2010)
“§ 841(a), (b)(1)(B), 18 U.S.C. § 18 (2006). In this appeal, Barraza challenges his conviction and sentence, and the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial under Fed.”
Colyer v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. (2009)
“Wyoming's DWUI laws had been adopted as federal law on the base pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 18 (1988). See Santiago, 846 F.”
United States v. Infante (2010)
“with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate or to place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel places that person in reasonable fear of the death, or serious bodily…”
Alfano v. United States (2009)
“1, “organization” is defined to exclude an “individual”: “ ‘Organization’ means ‘a person other than an individual.”
United States v. Brumfield (2015)
“The court rejected the defendant’s argument, that § 3612(f)(3) provided’ jurisdiction for such relief, noting that “Congress did not identify section 3612(f)(3) as a basis upon which an order of restitution can be altered or modified under 18 U.S.C. § 18 U.S.C. § 3664(o).”…”
United States v. Lin Lyn Trading, Ltd. (1996)
“See also 18 U.S.C. § 18 (the term “organization” includes a person other than an individual).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.