18 U.S.C. § 244
Discrimination against person wearing uniform of armed forces
Whoever, being a proprietor, manager, or employee of a theater or other public place of entertainment or amusement in the District of Columbia, or in any Territory, or Possession of the United States, causes any person wearing the uniform of any of the armed forces of the United States to be discriminated against because of that uniform, shall be fined under this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2023 · leading case: Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council
Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council (1993)
“, 18 U. S. C. § 244 ("any person wearing the uniform of any of the armed forces of the United States"); 38 U.”
Thompson v. Aland (1986)
“§ 243 deals with exclusion of jurors on account of race or color and 18 U.S.C. § 244 deals with discrimination against persons wearing uniform of armed forces, neither of which is applicable here.”
United States v. Abu Khatallah (2015)
“Such criminal offenses include discriminating against persons wearing the uniform of the armed forces, 18 U.S.C. § 244 ; commencing or facilitating an expedition against a friendly nation, 18 U.”
United States v. Al-Imam (2019)
“Such criminal offenses include discriminating against persons wearing the uniform of the armed forces, 18 U.S.C. § 244 ; commencing or facilitating an expedition against a friendly nation, 18 U.”
Detwiler v. United States (1975)
“These acts were by Revenue agents, not named as defendants, and are claimed to amount to willful oppression on the part of officers and agents of the Internal Revenue Service and violative of Acts of Congress, 18 U.S.C. § 244 , which is not relevant to this case, and 26 U.”
United States v. Al-Imam (2019)
“Such criminal offenses include discriminating against persons wearing the uniform of the armed forces, 18 U.S.C. § 244 ; commencing or facilitating an expedition against a friendly nation, 18 U.”
Grose v. City of Bartlett, Tennessee Government (2023)
“18 U.S.C.A. § 244 (West). Judge Claxton rightfully finds that Plaintiff has alleged no facts supporting a violation of § 244.”
Goodsell v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The (2020)
“§ 2381 ; his War Crimes claims are brought under 18 U.S.C. § 244 ; his Polygamy claims are brought under 1 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.