18 U.S.C. § 3482
Evidence and witnesses—(Rule)
Competency and privileges of witnesses and admissibility of evidence governed by principles of common law, Rule 26.
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, referred to in text, was amended in 1972. The subject matter is covered by the Federal Rules of Evidence, set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1967–2020 · leading case: Clifton Gregory v. United States
Clifton Gregory v. United States (1969)
“2 The appellant also challenges the testimony of a Government witness whose name was not on the original “capital list” required by 18 U.S.C. § 3482 (1964). 3 And his contention that the identification testimony of another witness was inadmissible on due process grounds compels…”
United States v. Louis Carreau, Inc. (1967)
“, the right to obtain a list of the Government’s witnesses before trial in capital cases, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3482 ; the right to have produced any prior statements or testimony of Government witnesses relating to the subject matter as to which the witnesses have testified, Title…”
United States v. Christopher Thompson (2020)
“The district court’s use of the form normally used in proceedings under 18 U.S.C.§ 3482(c)(2) and its stated reasons are sufficient to show that the district court exercised its discretion in granting a reduced sentenced within the new guideline range and in declining to vary…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3482(c)(2) — 1 case
United States v. Christopher Thompson (2020)
“The district court’s use of the form normally used in proceedings under 18 U.S.C.§ 3482(c)(2) and its stated reasons are sufficient to show that the district court exercised its discretion in granting a reduced sentenced within the new guideline range and in declining to vary…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.