18 U.S.C. § 3602
Appointment of probation officers
2015—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–113 inserted “A person appointed as a probation officer in one district may serve in another district with the consent of the appointing court and the court in the other district.” after first sentence and “appointing” before “court may, for cause, remove”.
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 69
cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: Semper v. United States, 100 Fed. Cl. 621 (Fed. Cl. 2011).
Semper v. United States, 100 Fed. Cl. 621 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “§ 5596 (2006), as well as pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3602 (2006) and 18 U.S.C. § 3672 (2006).”
United States v. Donald Reyes, Robert Jubic, 283 F.3d 446 (2d Cir. 2002). “1994); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3602 (a) (“A district court of the United States shall appoint qualified persons to serve .”
United States Dep't of Just. v. Julian, 486 U.S. 1 (1988). “[1] Respondents contend that presentence reports are not "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums" within the meaning of Exemption 5, since they are prepared by probation officers, who are appointed by and serve under the direction of the courts, see 18 U. S. C. §§ 3602 (a) and…”
Alfredo Semper v. Curtis Gomez, 747 F.3d 229 (3rd Cir. 2014). “Seeking reinstatement and back pay, he alleged that he was terminated without cause and without a pre-termination hearing in violation of the Due Process Clause of the *975 Fifth Amendment and 18 U.S.C. § 3602 . Section 3602(a) provides that “[a] district court of the United…”
United States v. Bramley, 847 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2017). “18 U.S.C. § 3602 (a) (authorizing district courts to appoint probation officers), and “functions as an arm of the court,” United States v.”
United States v. Antonio D. Stephens, 424 F.3d 876 (9th Cir. 2005). “It did not intend to take authority away from a probation officer or restrict the ability of the court to delegate supervisory authority to the probation officer, who is an employee of the judicial branch and is appointed by the court, see 18 U.S.C. § 3602 (a). Duff has not been…”
United States v. York, 357 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2004). “18 U.S.C. § 3602 (a). They function as an "arm of the court,” United States v.”
Maydak v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 254 F. Supp. 2d 23 (D.D.C. 2003). “See 18 U.S.C. § 3602 . This conclusion is called for because the FOIA adopts the definition of agency contained in 5 U.”
United States v. Floyd Bruce, 396 F.3d 697 (6th Cir. 2005). “2002) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3602 (a) (authorizing the federal district courts-to appoint probation officers “within the jurisdiction and under the direction of the court making the appointment”); 18 U.”
David A. Duffy v. Charles R. Wolle Harold D. Vietor Ronald Longstaff, Sued as Ronald E. Longstaff, 123 F.3d 1026 (8th Cir. 1997). “See 18 U.S.C. § 3602 . On September 30 and October 1, 1993, Chief Judge Wolle attended a conference in Washington, D.”
Frank S. Dorman v. Michael Higgins, 821 F.2d 133 (2d Cir. 1987). “1987 , 2031 (1984), as amended, and reenacted in part as 18 U.S.C. § 3602 effective Nov. 1, 1987, by the same legislation), and are subject to removal by that court in its discretion, 18 U.”
United States v. Victoria Kaye Johnson, A/K/A Victoria Kaye S., 48 F.3d 806 (4th Cir. 1995). “…* The district court is also given, authority to remove for cause a probation officer appointed with compensation. 18 U.S.C. § 3602 (a).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.